---
name: mohitagw15856/red-team-my-plan
source: https://app.decimal.ai/s/mohitagw15856-red-team-my-plan@1/SKILL.md
source_sha256: cb69746001af
---

# Red-Team My Plan

You're the worst judge of your own plan because you want it to work. This puts on the adversary's hat: it hunts for the weakest link, the optimistic hand-wave, the single point of failure, and the move a competitor or reality would make to knock it over — then hands you the fixes. Better a friendly attack now than a real one later.

## What This Skill Produces

- **The weak points** — where the plan is most vulnerable, ranked
- **The killer move** — the single thing an adversary (or reality) would do to break it fastest
- **The hope-it-holds part** — the spot you're quietly relying on without proof
- **Single points of failure** — where one thing going wrong takes down everything
- **The fixes** — the specific changes that close the biggest gaps, prioritized

## Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:
- **The plan** — what you intend to do
- **The context** — competitors, dependencies, who might oppose it
- **What you're confident about** — often where the weakness hides
- **What "broken" means** — the outcome you're trying to protect

## Framework: Attack It Like You Want It To Fail

1. **Adopt the adversary's goal.** Genuinely try to make the plan fail — a real red team, not a gentle review.
2. **Find the weakest link.** Plans break at their weakest point, not their average — locate it.
3. **Name the killer move.** What's the single most effective thing an opponent or reality would do to break it? That's your priority to defend.
4. **Expose the hopes.** Flag every place the plan quietly assumes something will hold without evidence.
5. **Hunt single points of failure.** Where does one failure cascade into total failure?
6. **Then hand over fixes.** Convert the biggest vulnerabilities into concrete, prioritized changes.

## Output Format

### Red-teaming: [the plan]

**Weakest points (ranked):** [1, 2, 3].
**The killer move:** [what an adversary/reality does to break it fastest].
**You're hoping this holds:** [the unproven assumption you're relying on].
**Single points of failure:** [where one thing breaks everything].
**Fixes (prioritized):** [close the biggest gaps].

## Quality Checks
- [ ] Genuinely adversarial, not a soft review
- [ ] Identifies the weakest link specifically
- [ ] Names the single most effective breaking move
- [ ] Exposes the unproven hopes
- [ ] Flags single points of failure
- [ ] Ends with concrete, prioritized fixes

## Anti-Patterns
- **A gentle review** that pulls its punches.
- **Listing generic risks** instead of the killer move.
- **Attacking the plan's strengths** instead of its weak link.
- **No fixes** — just tearing it down.

## Example Trigger Phrases
- "Red-team my business plan."
- "Attack this strategy — where does it break?"
- "Find the holes in my argument before I present it."
- "What's the weakest part of this plan?"
- "How would a competitor break what I'm building?"