---
name: thomasmoreai/heritage-protection-summary
source: https://app.decimal.ai/s/thomasmoreai-heritage-protection-summary@1/SKILL.md
source_sha256: 302abc8ea7fc
---

# Cultural Heritage Protection Legal Summary

Produces structured briefings on cultural heritage law developments for institutional stakeholders.

## Quick Start

1. **Define scope** — jurisdiction(s), date range, thematic focus (repatriation, trafficking, armed conflict, etc.)
2. **Identify audience** — legal advisors, policy makers, enforcement officials, or repatriation advocates
3. **Gather sources** — case decisions, legislative texts, treaty updates; conduct independent research if none provided

## Workflow

### Step 1: Executive Overview

Open with a ½–1 page summary:
- 3–5 most significant developments in the period
- Jurisdictional snapshot (international / regional / national)
- Emerging conflicts or trends requiring immediate attention

### Step 2: Thematic Sections

Include only sections with material developments:

| Section | Scope |
|---|---|
| Repatriation & Restitution | Artifact return decisions; provenance disputes; good-faith purchaser conflicts |
| Armed Conflict & Emergency | 1954 Hague Convention enforcement; UNSC resolutions; destruction as war crime |
| Illicit Trafficking | Prosecutions; customs seizures; import/export controls; market-state vs. source-state |
| Underwater Heritage | 2001 UNESCO Convention; salvage law conflicts; maritime jurisdiction |
| Intangible Cultural Heritage | 2003 UNESCO Convention; traditional knowledge; IP interface |
| Indigenous Cultural Rights | UNDRIP applications; NAGPRA enforcement [VERIFY recent amendments]; patrimony claims |
| Legislative & Regulatory | New statutes, amendments, administrative regulations |

### Step 3: Case Entries

Per decision, use this structure:

- **Case** — style of cause
- **Court/Tribunal** — name, date, jurisdiction
- **Heritage at Issue** — artifact / site / intangible property
- **Legal Framework** — UNESCO 1970 / Hague 1954 / UNIDROIT 1995 / national law
- **Key Question** — central legal issue
- **Holding** — court's determination
- **Practical Significance** — impact on practice or policy
- **Cross-Jurisdictional Note** — if decision may influence other systems

### Step 4: Trends & Recommendations

- Pattern analysis across developments
- Anticipated litigation or legislation
- Actionable recommendations for stakeholders

## Pitfalls & Checks

- **Flag uncertain citations** with `[VERIFY]` — exclude decisions lacking confirmed dates or courts
- **Do not conflate frameworks** — each has a distinct scope:
  - 1970 UNESCO → illicit trade
  - 1954 Hague → armed conflict
  - UNIDROIT 1995 → private law restitution
  - 2001 UNESCO → underwater heritage
- **Distinguish hard law from soft law** — mark resolutions, guidelines, and model laws vs. binding instruments
- **Flag CIL formation** — note decisions or state practice contributing to emerging customary international law
- **Non-trafficking destruction** — capture heritage loss from development, extractive industry, or climate events
- **Target length** — 3–7 pages; executive overview always leads