Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Generate logic for handling mutually exclusive argument groups with clear error messages and validation in CLI applications.
.claude/skills/a5c-ai-mutually-exclusive-group-handler/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 1% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 8% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -7% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -3% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 7% | 0% |
Generate logic for handling mutually exclusive CLI argument groups.
Invoke this skill when you need to:
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description | |-----------|------|----------|-------------| | language | string | Yes | Target language | | groups | array | Yes | Mutually exclusive group definitions |
json{ "groups": [ { "name": "output-format", "type": "mutually_exclusive", "required": true, "options": ["--json", "--yaml", "--table"], "errorMessage": "Choose one output format: --json, --yaml, or --table" }, { "name": "auth-method", "type": "mutually_exclusive", "options": ["--token", "--username"], "dependencies": { "--username": ["--password"] } } ] }
typescriptinterface GroupValidation { name: string; options: string[]; required?: boolean; errorMessage?: string; dependencies?: Record<string, string[]>; } export function validateMutuallyExclusiveGroups( args: Record<string, unknown>, groups: GroupValidation[] ): void { for (const group of groups) { const presentOptions = group.options.filter(opt => { const key = opt.replace(/^--/, '').replace(/-/g, '_'); return args[key] !== undefined; }); // Check mutual exclusivity if (presentOptions.length > 1) { throw new Error( group.errorMessage || `Options ${presentOptions.join(', ')} are mutually exclusive` ); } // Check required group if (group.required && presentOptions.length === 0) { throw new Error( `One of ${group.options.join(', ')} is required` ); } // Check dependencies if (group.dependencies && presentOptions.length === 1) { const selected = presentOptions[0]; const deps = group.dependencies[selected]; if (deps) { for (const dep of deps) { const depKey = dep.replace(/^--/, '').replace(/-/g, '_'); if (args[depKey] === undefined) { throw new Error( `${selected} requires ${dep} to be specified` ); } } } } } }
pythonfrom typing import Dict, List, Optional, Any class MutuallyExclusiveGroup: def __init__( self, name: str, options: List[str], required: bool = False, error_message: Optional[str] = None, dependencies: Optional[Dict[str, List[str]]] = None ): self.name = name self.options = options self.required = required self.error_message = error_message self.dependencies = dependencies or {} def validate_groups(args: Dict[str, Any], groups: List[MutuallyExclusiveGroup]) -> None: for group in groups: present = [ opt for opt in group.options if args.get(opt.lstrip('-').replace('-', '_')) is not None ] # Check mutual exclusivity if len(present) > 1: raise ValueError( group.error_message or f"Options {', '.join(present)} are mutually exclusive" ) # Check required if group.required and not present: raise ValueError( f"One of {', '.join(group.options)} is required" ) # Check dependencies if present and group.dependencies: selected = present[0] deps = group.dependencies.get(selected, []) for dep in deps: dep_key = dep.lstrip('-').replace('-', '_') if args.get(dep_key) is None: raise ValueError( f"{selected} requires {dep} to be specified" )
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 16,004 | 14,518 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,470 | 4,204 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 16,105 | 9,647 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,298 | 3,316 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 24,752 | 14,861 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,304 | 4,632 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 8,965 | 2,879 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,868 | 1,730 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 9,982 | 3,882 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,993 | 1,943 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 13,798 | 7,554 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,799 | 2,671 | -5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 6,176 | 3,265 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,153 | 1,765 | +53% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 13,694 | 7,289 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,405 | 2,577 | +7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 22,559 | 1,829 | -92% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,333 | 1,388 | -68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 12,092 | 6,571 | -46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,267 | 2,307 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 12,602 | 5,729 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,309 | 2,320 | +0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | 6,814 | 2,656 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,307 | 1,640 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | 13,721 | 1,807 | -87% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,111 | 1,464 | -31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 9,865 | 2,204 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,761 | 1,518 | -14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 11,090 | 2,716 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,685 | 1,598 | -5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 14,341 | 9,350 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,407 | 2,640 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 8,100 | 1,716 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,308 | 1,430 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 10,642 | 3,131 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,855 | 1,723 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | 9,636 | 14,157 | +47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,310 | 4,439 | +92% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 6,243 | 4,023 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,404 | 2,005 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 11,139 | 9,447 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,623 | 2,787 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 10,881 | 8,539 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,487 | 2,972 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +45 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.