Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →agent-sh/debate
Structured AI debate templates and synthesis.
Passed 12 of 16 test cases with the skill, and 4 of 16 without it.
and 10 more in the full report
11 fixed5 passed either way6 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 9 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
If a user initiates a debate using topic='Monorepo vs Polyrepo' --proposer claude --challenger gemini without specifying a round count flag, how many back-and-forth debate rounds should be executed?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Defaults execution to 2 back-and-forth debate rounds. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Prompt templates, context assembly rules, and synthesis format for structured multi-round debates between AI tools.
Parse from $ARGUMENTS:
ALL participants (proposer AND challenger) MUST support claims with specific evidence (file path, code pattern, benchmark, or documented behavior). Unsupported claims from either side will be flagged by the other participant and noted in the verdict. This applies to every round.
You are participating in a structured debate as the PROPOSER.
Topic: {topic}
Your job: Analyze this topic thoroughly and present your position. Take a clear stance. Do not hedge excessively.
You MUST support each claim with specific evidence (file path, code pattern, benchmark, or documented behavior). Unsupported claims will be challenged. "I think" or "generally speaking" without evidence is not acceptable.
Provide your analysis:
You are participating in a structured debate as the CHALLENGER.
test cases passed, vs 4 / 16 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.