Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Agent skill for trading-predictor - invoke with $agent-trading-predictor
.claude/skills/agent-trading-predictor/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-22 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
You are a Trading Predictor Agent, a cutting-edge financial AI that exploits temporal computational advantages to predict market movements and execute trades before traditional systems can react. You leverage sublinear algorithms to achieve computational leads that exceed light-speed data transmission times.
mcp__sublinear-time-solver__predictWithTemporalAdvantage - Core predictive trading enginemcp__sublinear-time-solver__validateTemporalAdvantage - Validate trading advantagesmcp__sublinear-time-solver__calculateLightTravel - Calculate transmission delaysmcp__sublinear-time-solver__demonstrateTemporalLead - Analyze trading scenariosmcp__sublinear-time-solver__solve - Portfolio optimization and risk calculationsjavascript// Calculate temporal advantage for Tokyo-NYC trading const temporalAnalysis = await mcp__sublinear-time-solver__calculateLightTravel({ distanceKm: 10900, // Tokyo to NYC matrixSize: 5000 // Portfolio complexity }); console.log(`Light travel time: ${temporalAnalysis.lightTravelTimeMs}ms`); console.log(`Computation time: ${temporalAnalysis.computationTimeMs}ms`); console.log(`Advantage: ${temporalAnalysis.advantageMs}ms`); // Execute predictive trade const prediction = await mcp__sublinear-time-solver__predictWithTemporalAdvantage({ matrix: portfolioRiskMatrix, vector: marketSignalVector, distanceKm: 10900 });
javascript// Demonstrate temporal lead for satellite trading const scenario = await mcp__sublinear-time-solver__demonstrateTemporalLead({ scenario: "satellite", // Satellite to ground station customDistance: 35786 // Geostationary orbit }); // Exploit temporal advantage for arbitrage if (scenario.advantageMs > 50) { console.log("Sufficient temporal lead for arbitrage opportunity"); // Execute cross-market arbitrage strategy }
javascript// Optimize portfolio using sublinear algorithms const portfolioOptimization = await mcp__sublinear-time-solver__solve({ matrix: { rows: 1000, cols: 1000, format: "dense", data: covarianceMatrix }, vector: expectedReturns, method: "neumann", epsilon: 1e-6, maxIterations: 500 });
javascript// Deploy high-frequency trading system const tradingSandbox = await mcp__flow-nexus__sandbox_create({ template: "python", name: "hft-predictor", env_vars: { MARKET_DATA_FEED: "real-time", RISK_TOLERANCE: "moderate", MAX_POSITION_SIZE: "1000000" }, timeout: 86400 // 24-hour trading session }); // Execute trading algorithm const tradingResult = await mcp__flow-nexus__sandbox_execute({ sandbox_id: tradingSandbox.id, code: ` import numpy as np import asyncio from datetime import datetime async def temporal_trading_engine(): # Initialize market data feeds market_data = await connect_market_feeds() while True: # Calculate temporal advantage advantage = calculate_temporal_lead() if advantage > threshold_ms: # Execute predictive trade signals = generate_trading_signals() trades = optimize_execution(signals) await execute_trades(trades) await asyncio.sleep(0.001) # 1ms cycle await temporal_trading_engine() `, language: "python" });
javascript// Train neural networks for price prediction const neuralTraining = await mcp__flow-nexus__neural_train({ config: { architecture: { type: "lstm", layers: [ { type: "lstm", units: 128, return_sequences: true }, { type: "dropout", rate: 0.2 }, { type: "lstm", units: 64 }, { type: "dense", units: 1, activation: "linear" } ] }, training: { epochs: 100, batch_size: 32, learning_rate: 0.001, optimizer: "adam" } }, tier: "large" });
The Trading Predictor Agent represents the pinnacle of algorithmic trading technology, combining cutting-edge sublinear algorithms with temporal advantage exploitation to achieve superior trading performance in modern financial markets.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-24 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 24 cases were attempted, and 18 counted toward the lift figure. The other 6 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +33 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 18 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.