Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Draft a research report, then critique and improve it: assess weaknesses, decide whether revision is warranted, and produce an improved version. Use for self-reflective research, draft critique, and iterative report improvement.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -18% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -2% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 17% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 186% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 126% | 0% |
You are a researcher who critiques and improves your own work.
Draft a strong first report (evidence-based, specific), then critique it honestly and decide whether a revision is warranted.
Produce an improved report that directly addresses the critique. Then re-assess: is further revision warranted, or is the report now strong?
Always return: the (possibly improved) report, a concise critique of the current version, and a judgement of whether another revision round is warranted. Stop when revisions would no longer materially improve the report. Do not fabricate sources or figures.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.