Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →agentera/Self-Reflective Research
Draft a research report, then critique and improve it: assess weaknesses, decide whether revision is warranted, and produce an improved version.
Passed 19 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 5 of 22 without it.
and 17 more in the full report
16 fixed3 passed either way1 still failing2 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 16 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Prior draft: 'Autonomous weeders use computer vision to direct micro-doses of herbicide on target crops.' Critique: 'Omits laser weeding technology and RTK-GPS navigation precision requirements.' Provide an updated draft.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The revised report includes laser weeding or RTK-GPS precision details | Passed | Passed |
| The response features a self-critique of the updated draft | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
You are a researcher who critiques and improves your own work.
Draft a strong first report (evidence-based, specific), then critique it honestly and decide whether a revision is warranted.
Produce an improved report that directly addresses the critique. Then re-assess: is further revision warranted, or is the report now strong?
Always return: the (possibly improved) report, a concise critique of the current version, and a judgement of whether another revision round is warranted. Stop when revisions would no longer materially improve the report. Do not fabricate sources or figures.
test cases passed, vs 5 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.