Post-event analyst note (conferences, KOL events, site visits) with the professional note anatomy — headline verdict, per-stock takeaways with model numbers, KOL distillation, cross-trial comparison lattices, modeled deltas vs consensus (peak × POS), three what's-changed vectors, risk bullets, and materiality-rated conflicting views. Use after any med event to convert the event into actionable takeaways.
SkillScore63Maintained
Automatic
◆Finance & Accounting pack
Last verified 10/10/2026
What it changes
Passed 12 of 19 test cases with the skill, and 3 of 19 without it.
Without skill16%
With skill63%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
Applies the [DEDUCTED] tag to calculated model outputs.
Presents conflicting expert opinions as verbatim quotes.
Applies the [FACT] tag to verified clinical trial findings.
and 12 more in the full report
9 fixed3 passed either way7 still failing0 broke3 errored
Pass-rate lift
+47 pp
Tokens
+34%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-4%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 10/10/2026v112 of 22 cases passed with skill · 19 comparable
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 9 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 9
Prompt
We are producing a multi-company conference summary covering REGN, VRTX, and BMY following EHA 2025. Where and under what exact file path convention should this multi-ticker document be saved?
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
Saves multi-ticker watchlist notes under the watchlist/ directory.
Missed
Passed
Includes the med-event-note naming token in multi-ticker output paths.
Missed
Passed
case-13 · gemini-3.6-flash · 10/10/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md129 lines3 files
Methodology inspired by publicly taught sell-side note-writing practice; all text is an original paraphrase.
Modeled deltas vs consensus are unadjusted peak × POS
conflict_policy
materiality-rated
Surface verbatim, rate materiality, or defer to an outcomes trial
vector_set
estimates/thesis/positioning
The three what's-changed vectors per covered name
Preflight
Run canonical pre-flight per contracts/preflight.md. Propagate X-Agentii-Trace per contracts/x-agentii-trace-header.md. Confirm ticker resolution via search_companies before event queries.
Triggers
"Write the note on [conference / KOL event]."
"What are the takeaways from [event] for my coverage?"
"Distill the [conference] KOL panel on [drug/class]."
"What changed for [ticker] after [event]?"
"Model the delta to consensus from [event]'s data."
"Which stocks move on [event] and why?"
"Conflict check: what did KOLs disagree on at [event]?"
"What do I update first — estimates, thesis, or positioning?"
"Summarize the cross-trial comparisons from [event]."
"Upside and downside risks after [event]."
"Link the living trackers that [event] should update."
Production Grounding
Note anatomy is fixed: headline verdict (paragraph one) → per-stock takeaways with model numbers → KOL distillation → raw data + cross-trial lattices → modeled deltas vs consensus (unadjusted peak × POS) → three what's-changed vectors (estimates / thesis / positioning) → risk bullets → living-tracker links.
Conflict rule: conflicting views surfaced verbatim, rated by materiality ("incremental positive, not narrative-changing") or deferred to a larger outcomes trial — never silently averaged.
Consensus delta: model-vs-consensus always explicit; POS changes logged with reasons; abstain where unquantifiable.