Automatically evaluate and compare multiple AI models or agents without pre-existing test data. Generates test queries from a task description, collects responses from all target endpoints, auto-generates evaluation rubrics, runs pairwise comparisons via a judge model, and produces win-rate rankings with reports and charts. Supports checkpoint resume, incremental endpoint addition, and judge model hot-swap.
SkillScore100Maintained
Automatic
◆AI Engineer pack
Last verified 10/11/2026
What it changes
Passed 22 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 9 of 22 without it.
Without skill41%
With skill100%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
Specifies base_url for the custom endpoint
Executes evaluation using pipeline.evaluate
Includes the --save flag to save output results
and 19 more in the full report
13 fixed9 passed either way0 still failing0 broke1 errored
Pass-rate lift
+59 pp
Tokens
+62%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-51%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 10/11/2026v122 of 23 cases passed with skill · 22 comparable
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 13 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 13
Prompt
I am enabling the Markdown evaluation report in my arena configuration and want to include exactly 5 illustrative example comparisons per section instead of the default 3. How should this be specified in `config.yaml`?
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
Configures include_examples set to 5 under the report section
Missed
Passed
case-20 · gemini-3.6-flash · 10/11/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md261 linessingle file
Auto Arena Skill
End-to-end automated model comparison using the OpenJudge AutoArenaPipeline:
Generate queries — LLM creates diverse test queries from task description
Collect responses — query all target endpoints concurrently
Verify a BibTeX file for hallucinated or fabricated references by cross-checking every entry against CrossRef, arXiv, and DBLP. Reports each reference as verified, suspect, or not found, with field-level mismatch details (title, authors, year, DOI). Use when the user wants to check a .bib file for fake citations, validate references in a paper, or audit bibliography entries for accuracy.