Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Structured JSON logging with correlation IDs for multi-service systems. Use when implementing logging, debugging failures, or tracing errors across services. Triggers on: add logging, error handling, debug failures, trace errors.
.claude/skills/aiskillstore-error-logger/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -20% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -44% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -4% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 5% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -30% | 0% |
Structured JSON logging with correlation IDs for multi-service systems.
Start operation with appropriate prefix (liq_, arb_, quo_, op_).
Include correlation ID in all related log entries.
Pass via X-Correlation-ID header across services.
json{ "timestamp": "2024-01-15T14:32:01.847Z", "level": "ERROR", "correlation_id": "liq_18d4f2a1_x7k9", "service": "rust-hotpath", "event_type": "TX_REVERT", "message": "Liquidation reverted", "context": {} }
Format: {prefix}_{timestamp_hex}_{random} Prefixes: liq_, arb_, quo_, op_
typescriptconst ctx = log.startOperation('liq'); log.error(ctx, 'TX_REVERT', 'Failed', { tx_hash, gas_used }); // Propagate via HTTP headers: { 'X-Correlation-ID': ctx.correlation_id }
| Level | Use For | |-------|---------| | ERROR | Operation failures | | WARN | Retries, recoverable | | INFO | Normal operations | | DEBUG | Calculations |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 16,332 | 18,902 | +16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,110 | 2,490 | -20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 19,524 | 11,181 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,979 | 1,659 | -44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 19,987 | 20,222 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,962 | 3,823 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 15,552 | 18,622 | +20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,333 | 3,487 | +5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 23,147 | 27,083 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,711 | 2,580 | -30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 15,240 | 3,550 | -77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,583 | 958 | -39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 15,733 | 7,394 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,703 | 792 | -53% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 8,377 | 4,763 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,429 | 1,249 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 11,212 | 7,461 | -33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 764 | 741 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 11,035 | 2,056 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 763 | 634 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 8,939 | 6,964 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 405 | 726 | +79% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 11,406 | 10,468 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,080 | 940 | -55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 15,514 | 6,793 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,949 | 1,825 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 12,251 | 7,146 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,935 | 688 | -64% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 13,137 | 9,997 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,783 | 1,425 | -49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 15,874 | 3,346 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,787 | 867 | -51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 13,323 | 4,030 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,473 | 1,100 | -25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 9,220 | 7,134 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,053 | 706 | -33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 17,548 | 14,706 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,248 | 1,353 | -40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 20,386 | 10,382 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,718 | 1,400 | -48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 16,463 | 12,694 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,935 | 1,412 | -27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 12,580 | 8,952 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,872 | 687 | -63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 9,314 | 15,084 | +62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,558 | 2,211 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | pass→pass | 11,578 | 5,120 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,340 | 1,338 | -0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-25 | pass→pass | 16,589 | 11,650 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,284 | 1,741 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 25 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +52 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 25 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.