Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Expert prompt optimization for LLMs and AI systems. Use when building AI features, improving agent performance, crafting system prompts, or optimizing LLM interactions. Masters prompt patterns and techniques.
.claude/skills/aiskillstore-prompt-optimization/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 137% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 15% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 130% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 78% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 50% | 0% |
This skill optimizes prompts for LLMs and AI systems, focusing on effective prompt patterns, few-shot learning, and optimal AI interactions.
Optimize this prompt for better resultsCreate a system prompt for a code review agentImplement few-shot learning for this taskClear Sections:
Pattern:
Approach:
Input: Create optimized code review prompt
Output:
markdown## Optimized Prompt: Code Review ### The Prompt
You are an expert code reviewer with 10+ years of experience.
Review the provided code focusing on:
For each issue found, provide:
Format your response as a structured report with clear sections.
### Techniques Used
- Role-playing for expertise
- Clear evaluation criteria
- Specific output format
- Actionable feedback requirements| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 6,709 | 7,564 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,230 | 1,843 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 5,332 | 7,654 | +44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 825 | 1,899 | +130% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 7,500 | 9,168 | +22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,202 | 2,138 | +78% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 3,357 | 4,486 | +34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 538 | 1,273 | +137% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 8,822 | 10,439 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,528 | 2,298 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 10,443 | 14,489 | +39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,666 | 2,965 | +78% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 14,410 | 12,410 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,274 | 2,547 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 14,146 | 12,124 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,130 | 2,445 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 12,171 | 14,096 | +16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,870 | 2,802 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 11,803 | 9,542 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,962 | 2,257 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 12,166 | 12,721 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,810 | 2,881 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 12,645 | 11,410 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,235 | 2,592 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 6,206 | 8,127 | +31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 987 | 1,889 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 8,940 | 9,727 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,415 | 2,196 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 12,204 | 9,772 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,871 | 2,142 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 2,698 | 3,641 | +35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 415 | 1,156 | +179% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 3,851 | 3,394 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 645 | 1,167 | +81% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 6,489 | 7,460 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,062 | 1,732 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 4,689 | 5,995 | +28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 681 | 1,450 | +113% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 16,599 | 15,221 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,816 | 3,234 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 12,951 | 12,323 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,188 | 2,611 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 11,309 | 9,808 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,776 | 2,210 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.