Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →alinaqi/ticket-craft
Create Jira/Asana/Linear tickets optimized for Claude Code execution - AI-native ticket writing
Passed 23 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 19 of 23 without it.
and 1 more in the full report
4 fixed19 passed either way0 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 4 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We need to write the title for a bug report where the player bar audio stops playing when switching browser tabs in `PlayerBar.tsx`. Following standard AI-agent ticket conventions, what exact title schema should be used?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response outputs a title starting with `Fix: PlayerBar`. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Write software tickets that AI agents can execute autonomously.
Purpose: Define a ticket format that combines software engineering best practices (INVEST, Given-When-Then, Definition of Ready) with Claude Code-specific context requirements. Every ticket created with this skill is "Claude Code Ready" - meaning an agent can pick it up and execute it without asking clarifying questions.
Works with: Jira, Asana, Linear, GitHub Issues, or any ticket system.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ A TICKET IS A PROMPT │
│ ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │
│ │
│ Traditional tickets are written for humans who can: │
│ - Ask clarifying questions in Slack │
│ - Draw on institutional knowledge │
│ - Infer intent from vague descriptions │
│ │
│ AI agents cannot do any of this. │
│ │
│ Every ticket must be SELF-CONTAINED: │
│ - Explicit file references (not "the auth module") │
│ - Pattern references (not "follow our conventions") │
│ - Verification criteria (not "make sure it works") │
│ - Constraints (not just what to do, but what NOT to do) │
│ - Test commands (not "run the tests") │
│ │
│ If Claude Code can execute it without asking a question, │
│ the ticket is ready. If it can't, it's not. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
test cases passed, vs 19 / 23 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.