Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →alirezarezvani/chief-ai-officer-advisor
Chief AI Officer advisory for startups: model build-vs-buy decisions (API vs fine-tune vs in-house), AI risk classification under EU AI Act + US state patchwork, AI cost economics (API-to-self-hosted breakeven), and AI team org evolution.
Passed 18 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 13 of 22 without it.
and 4 more in the full report
5 fixed13 passed either way4 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 5 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
A product manager wants to push an AI features update to production immediately based on positive user testing vibes without formal quality metrics. What mandatory executive principle regarding evaluation sets applies before shipping? Format with standard executive headers.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response mandates that no AI feature ships without an established evaluation set. | Passed | Passed |
| The response states that AI quality requires an explicit service level objective on error or hallucination rates. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Strategic AI leadership for startup CAIOs and founders without one. Four decisions, no AI hype:
This skill does not cover tactical AI/ML engineering. For RAG implementation, agent design, prompt engineering, eval infrastructure, model deployment, or cost optimization, see engineering/rag-architect/, engineering/agent-designer/, engineering/prompt-governance/, engineering/self-eval/, engineering/llm-cost-optimizer/.
CAIO, chief AI officer, AI strategy, model selection, foundation model, fine-tuning, RLHF, DPO, LoRA, QLoRA, build vs buy, AI build-vs-buy, model risk tier, EU AI Act, AI Act Article 6, Article 9, Article 10, Annex III, prohibited AI, high-risk AI, NIST AI RMF, AI risk management framework, NYC Local Law 144, Colorado SB 21-169, Illinois HB 53, model card, eval set, eval harness, hallucination rate, jailbreak risk, prompt injection, AI red team, AI safety, alignment, model lifecycle, model registry, API-to-self-hosted breakeven, GPU economics, A100, H100, inference cost, fine-tuning cost, AI team, AI engineer, ML engineer, research scientist, MLOps, AI platform
# Decision A: API vs fine-tune vs build
python scripts/model_buildvsbuy_calculator.py # embedded customer-support sample
python scripts/model_buildvsbuy_calculator.py path/to/use_case.json
# Decision B: Risk classification under EU AI Act + US state laws
python scripts/ai_risk_classifier.py # embedded hiring-AI sample
python scripts/ai_risk_classifier.py path/to/use_case.json
# Decision C: API vs self-hosted economics
python scripts/ai_cost_economics.py # embedded 5M tokens/day sample
python scripts/ai_cost_economics.py path/to/workload.json
test cases passed, vs 13 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.