Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Calculate SaaS health metrics (ARR, MRR, churn, CAC, LTV, NRR) and benchmark against industry standards. Usage: /saas-health <metrics|quick-ratio|simulate> [options]
.claude/skills/alirezarezvani-saas-health/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -37% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -45% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -33% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -61% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -18% | 0% |
Calculate SaaS financial health metrics from raw business numbers, benchmark against industry standards, and project forward.
/saas-health metrics --mrr <amount> [--customers <n>] [--churned <n>] [--json]
/saas-health quick-ratio --new-mrr <amount> --churned <amount> [--expansion <amount>]
/saas-health simulate --mrr <amount> --growth <pct> --churn <pct> --cac <amount> [--json]/saas-health metrics --mrr 80000 --customers 200 --churned 3 --new-customers 15 --sm-spend 25000
/saas-health quick-ratio --new-mrr 10000 --expansion 2000 --churned 3000 --contraction 500
/saas-health simulate --mrr 50000 --growth 10 --churn 3 --cac 2000finance/skills/saas-metrics-coach/scripts/metrics_calculator.py — Core SaaS metrics (ARR, MRR, churn, CAC, LTV, NRR, payback)finance/skills/saas-metrics-coach/scripts/quick_ratio_calculator.py — Growth efficiency ratiofinance/skills/saas-metrics-coach/scripts/unit_economics_simulator.py — 12-month forward projection→ finance/skills/saas-metrics-coach/SKILL.md
/financial-health — Traditional financial analysis (ratios, DCF, budgets)| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 9,197 | 3,391 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,739 | 1,092 | -37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 12,656 | 4,094 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,266 | 1,235 | -45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 8,861 | 3,440 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,654 | 1,105 | -33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 6,236 | 2,251 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,028 | 823 | -20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 3,827 | 2,264 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 677 | 815 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 11,646 | 2,237 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,190 | 855 | -61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 5,502 | 2,548 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,182 | 964 | -18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 5,028 | 1,874 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 988 | 765 | -23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 6,640 | 2,249 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,326 | 797 | -40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 5,257 | 1,688 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,034 | 775 | -25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 3,292 | 1,159 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 611 | 594 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 6,865 | 2,419 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,049 | 661 | -37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 4,137 | 1,606 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 610 | 680 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 8,305 | 3,515 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,418 | 1,058 | -25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 3,997 | 1,072 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 616 | 558 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 5,761 | 2,630 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,310 | 962 | -27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 8,922 | 2,622 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,850 | 986 | -47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 5,976 | 2,535 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,211 | 949 | -22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 6,270 | 3,212 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,187 | 1,042 | -12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 7,511 | 9,353 | +25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,741 | 2,652 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 4,569 | 6,261 | +37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,055 | 1,791 | +70% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 5,502 | 4,535 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,127 | 1,264 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +68 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.