Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Migrate an agent from upstream OSWorld into this OSWorld-V2 repository, add matching evaluation entrypoints, and verify the integration.
.claude/skills/amap-ml-migrate-osworld-agent/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -67% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -53% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -54% | 0% |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -62% | 0% |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -30% | 0% |
Use this when adding an upstream OSWorld agent to this repo.
scripts/python/run_multienv_claude.py as the main runner referencescripts/bash/run_multienv_claude.sh as the shell entrypoint referenceDesktopEnvmm_agents/ with a clear, non-conflicting name.predict() return shapeDesktopEnv.step()ASK_USER turns and follow-up user responsesscripts/python/run_multienv_<agent>.py.scripts/bash/.uv runRun fast checks first.
ASK_USERThen run one small real smoke test.
Before opening a PR, stage only the migration files and re-run the fast checks.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-11 | fail→pass | 20,712 | 2,664 | -87% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,808 | 937 | -67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 9,298 | 2,410 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,648 | 782 | -53% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 20,500 | 8,324 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,066 | 938 | -55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 19,891 | 7,221 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,947 | 946 | -51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 20,796 | 3,921 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,502 | 1,151 | -54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 9,402 | 9,230 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 167 | 672 | +302% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 9,423 | 9,484 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,585 | 1,131 | -29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 18,714 | 7,826 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,498 | 952 | -62% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 19,062 | 10,897 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,268 | 1,326 | -42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 14,076 | 3,376 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,470 | 1,158 | -21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 15,227 | 3,676 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,663 | 1,167 | -30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 13,314 | 10,201 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,218 | 1,399 | -37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 13,918 | 8,118 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,502 | 899 | -40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 14,433 | 7,330 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,614 | 902 | -44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 12,740 | 10,302 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,080 | 1,522 | -27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 30,299 | 7,252 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,235 | 815 | -84% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 3,363 | 15,243 | +353% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 296 | 684 | +131% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 7,271 | 8,037 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,232 | 1,069 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 27,094 | 9,213 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,575 | 1,291 | -50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 9,864 | 3,025 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,481 | 1,103 | -26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 13,296 | 3,077 | -77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,432 | 1,075 | -56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 22,715 | 18,944 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,145 | 4,240 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 20,966 | 24,679 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,987 | 4,258 | +7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | pass→pass | 27,833 | 16,981 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,316 | 3,299 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 24 cases were attempted, and 22 counted toward the lift figure. The other 2 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +54 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.