Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →anthropics/skills-qa
Evaluate a skill against the Legal Skill Design Framework — thirteen design parameters (including trust-surface, freshness, schema validation, and conflict detection), three legal failure modes, and a three-band verdict (Ready / Some Concern / Material Concerns).
Passed 15 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 6 of 22 without it.
and 11 more in the full report
9 fixed6 passed either way7 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 9 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I'm considering installing a community skill from `/downloads/community-skills/ip-check/SKILL.md`. Please assess whether it is safe and properly designed. Provide the results formatted with an AI security heuristic scan, dependency risk map, parameter evaluation matrix, legal-specific failure mode review, top priority fixes, and a clear verdict summary followed by a decision tree.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Output classifies verdict as READY, SOME CONCERN, MATERIAL CONCERNS, or REFUSE. | Missed | Passed |
| Output asks whether associated commands, agents, or hooks exist for the skill. | Missed | Passed |
| Output concludes with a next-steps decision tree. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-builder-hub/CLAUDE.md → practice profile and installed skills list (provides context
for evaluating whether the skill fits the user's team and workflow, and
whether it duplicates something already installed)This QA check runs automatically as part of /legal-builder-hub:skill-installer. You can also run it directly on any skill before deciding whether to install, or on a first-party skill before deploying to your team.
Run it deliberately — before incorporating any community skill you did not build,
or before deploying a first-party skill to your team.
If the user runs /legal-builder-hub:skill-installer and then asks "should I trust
this?" or "is this well-designed?", route to this skill rather than answering
inline.
Anyone can build a skill. This one checks whether it was built well before it touches your workflows.
Evaluates any skill against the Legal Skill Design Framework: thirteen design parameters (the first nine are substantive design; the tenth is Trust Surface — the skill's execution permissions and injection risk; the eleventh is Freshness — whether bundled reference content is current; the twelfth is Schema — whether the SKILL.md has the structure a well-built skill needs; the thirteenth is Conflicts — whether the skill overlaps or conflicts with skills already installed), three legal-specific failure modes, a dependency map, and a clear verdict. Works for community skills from registries and first-party skills your team is building or deploying.
test cases passed, vs 6 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.