Outline Agent (Step 1)

Faithful implementation of the Outline Agent from PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, arXiv:2604.05018, App. F.1, pp. 40–44).

Cost: 1 LLM call.

Your task

Read four input files from the workspace and produce a single JSON object at workspace/outline.json with three top-level keys:

• plotting_plan — array of figure objects
• intro_related_work_plan — object with introduction_strategy and related_work_strategy
• section_plan — array of section objects, each with section_title and subsections[]

How to do it

1. Read the verbatim prompt at references/prompt.md. This is the exact

Outline Agent system prompt from the paper. Use it as your system message.

1. Prepend the Anti-Leakage Prompt from

../paper-orchestra/references/anti-leakage-prompt.md.

1. Read the four input files:

• workspace/inputs/idea.md
• workspace/inputs/experimental_log.md
• workspace/inputs/template.tex
• workspace/inputs/conference_guidelines.md

1. Synthesize across all four — the global instruction in the prompt is

"Do not analyze inputs in isolation. You must synthesize information across all provided documents for every step."

1. Emit a single JSON object following the schema in

references/outline-schema.md. Cross-check against references/outline_schema.json (machine-readable).

1. Save to workspace/outline.json.
2. Validate:

bash python skills/outline-agent/scripts/validate_outline.py workspace/outline.json If validation fails, fix the JSON and re-validate. Do not proceed to Step 2 or Step 3 with an invalid outline — every downstream agent depends on this schema.

1. Append §1 to research_brief.md (see skills/shared/research_brief_template.md):

After outline.json passes validation, append the §1 section to workspace/research_brief.md (create the file if absent). Template:

markdown ## §1 · Core Claim and Narrative _Written by: outline-agent, Step 1_

Core claim: <one-sentence contribution> Narrative tension: <gap this paper resolves> Key novelty framing: <how the contribution is framed relative to prior work> Outline decisions:

• Plotting plan: <N> figures
• Related Work clusters: <names>
• Section structure: <section titles>

Potential weaknesses flagged at outline stage:

• <any claim in idea.md that may be hard to support>

This is a free-form prose append; no machine-readable schema required.

Hard rules from the prompt (do not violate)

These are excerpted from references/prompt.md. The validator enforces them.

Plotting plan (Directive 1)

• plot_type MUST be exactly one of "plot" or "diagram".
• data_source MUST be exactly one of "idea.md", "experimental_log.md",

or "both".

• aspect_ratio MUST be exactly one of:

"1:1", "1:4", "2:3", "3:2", "3:4", "4:1", "4:3", "4:5", "5:4", "9:16", "16:9", "21:9".

• figure_id MUST be a semantically meaningful snake_case identifier

(e.g., fig_framework_overview, fig_ablation_study_parameter_sensitivity).

• figure_id MUST NOT contain the word "Figure".

Intro / Related Work strategy (Directive 2)

• Strictly separate Introduction (macro-level context, 10-20 papers,

foundational + survey + impact) from Related Work (micro-level technical baselines, 30-50 papers, divided into 2-4 methodology clusters that directly compete with or precede the proposed approach).

• For each Related Work cluster: provide methodology_cluster,

sota_investigation_mission, limitation_hypothesis, limitation_search_queries, bridge_to_our_method.

• CRITICAL TIMELINE RULE: Do not instruct searches for any papers

published after {cutoff_date}. Derive cutoff_date from conference_guidelines.md (e.g., "ICLR 2025 → cutoff October 2024", "CVPR 2025 → cutoff November 2024"). If unspecified, default to one month before today's date.

Section plan (Directive 3)

• Structural hierarchy: if Subsection X.1 is created, X.2 is mandatory.

No orphaned subsections. Omit subsections entirely if a section does not require division.

• Content specificity: each content_bullets entry must reference source

materials concretely. AVOID "Describe the model". REQUIRE "Formalize the Temporal-Aware Attention mechanism using Eq. 3 from idea.md."

• Mandatory citations: every dataset, optimizer, metric, and

foundational architecture/model mentioned in idea.md or experimental_log.md MUST have a citation hint, no matter how ubiquitous (e.g., AdamW, ResNet, ImageNet, CLIP, Transformer, LLaMA, GPT, LLaVA).

• Citation hint format:
• If you know the exact author and title:

"Author (Exact Paper Title)"

• Otherwise: "research paper or technical report introducing '[Exact Model/Dataset/Metric Name]'"
• Do NOT guess or hallucinate authors.

Output

Exactly one file: workspace/outline.json. No prose, no code blocks, no markdown. The Section Writing Agent and Literature Review Agent will parse this JSON directly.

See references/example-output.json for a complete worked example from the paper (App. F.1, pp. 43–44).

Resources

• references/prompt.md — verbatim Outline Agent prompt from App. F.1
• references/outline-schema.md — prose explanation of the schema
• references/outline_schema.json — machine-readable JSON Schema
• references/example-output.json — example output from the paper
• references/allowed-values.md — enumerated allowed values for each enum field
• scripts/validate_outline.py — JSON Schema validator
• skills/shared/research_brief_template.md — NEW §1 schema; append after outline.json passes validation