Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Compile LaTeX paper to PDF, fix errors, and verify output. Use when user says "编译论文", "compile paper", "build PDF", "生成PDF", or wants to compile LaTeX into a submission-ready PDF.
.claude/skills/aris-paper-compile/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Compile the LaTeX paper and fix any issues: $ARGUMENTS
latexmk — LaTeX build tool. Handles multi-pass compilation automatically.pdflatex — LaTeX engine. Options: pdflatex (default), xelatex (for CJK/custom fonts), lualatex.paper/ — Directory containing LaTeX source files.Check that the compilation environment is ready:
bash# Check LaTeX installation which pdflatex && which latexmk && which bibtex # If not installed, provide instructions: # macOS: brew install --cask mactex-no-gui # Ubuntu: sudo apt-get install texlive-full # Server: conda install -c conda-forge texlive-core
Verify all required files exist:
bash# Must exist ls $PAPER_DIR/main.tex # Should exist ls $PAPER_DIR/references.bib ls $PAPER_DIR/sections/*.tex ls $PAPER_DIR/figures/*.pdf 2>/dev/null || ls $PAPER_DIR/figures/*.png 2>/dev/null
bashcd $PAPER_DIR # Clean previous build artifacts latexmk -C # Full compilation (pdflatex + bibtex + pdflatex × 2) latexmk -pdf -interaction=nonstopmode -halt-on-error main.tex 2>&1 | tee compile.log
If compilation fails, read compile.log and fix common errors:
Missing packages:
! LaTeX Error: File `somepackage.sty' not found.→ Install via tlmgr install somepackage or remove the \usepackage if unused.
Undefined references:
LaTeX Warning: Reference `fig:xyz' on page 3 undefined→ Check \label{fig:xyz} exists in the correct figure environment.
Missing figures:
! LaTeX Error: File `figures/fig1.pdf' not found.→ Check if the file exists with a different extension (.png vs .pdf). Update the \includegraphics path.
Citation undefined:
LaTeX Warning: Citation `smith2024' undefined→ Add the missing entry to references.bib or fix the citation key.
[VERIFY] markers in text: → Search for [VERIFY] markers left by /aris-paper-write. These indicate unverified citations or facts. Search for the correct information or flag to the user.
Overfull hbox:
Overfull \hbox (12.5pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 42--45→ Minor: usually ignorable. If severe (>20pt), rephrase the text or adjust figure width.
BibTeX errors:
I was expecting a `,' or a `}'---line 15 of references.bib→ Fix BibTeX syntax (missing comma, unmatched braces, special characters in title).
\crefname undefined for custom theorem types: → Ensure \crefname{assumption}{Assumption}{Assumptions} and similar are in the preamble after \newtheorem{assumption}.
for attempt in 1..MAX_COMPILE_ATTEMPTS:
compile()
if success:
break
parse_errors()
auto_fix()For each error:
compile.logStuck after 2 attempts? If Codex plugin is installed, invoke /codex:rescue — Codex can independently read the LaTeX source and compile.log to spot issues Claude missed (e.g., conflicting packages, encoding problems, subtle macro errors). If not installed, continue with Claude's own diagnosis.
After successful compilation, verify the output:
bash# Check PDF exists and has content ls -la main.pdf # Check page count pdfinfo main.pdf | grep Pages # macOS: open for visual inspection # open main.pdf
Automated checks:
bash# Check for undefined references grep -c "LaTeX Warning.*undefined" compile.log # Check for missing citations grep -c "Citation.*undefined" compile.log
CRITICAL: Verify paper fits within MAX_PAGES.
For ML conferences (ICLR/NeurIPS/ICML/CVPR/ACL/AAAI): Main body = first page through end of Conclusion section (not necessarily §5 — could be §6, §7, or §8 depending on structure). References and appendix are NOT counted.
For IEEE venues: The TOTAL page count (including references) must fit within the limit. There is no separate "main body" counting — everything up to and including the references counts.
Precise check using pdftotext:
bash# Extract text and find where Conclusion ends vs References begin pdftotext main.pdf - | python3 -c " import sys text = sys.stdin.read() pages = text.split('\f') for i, page in enumerate(pages): if 'Ethics Statement' in page or 'Reproducibility' in page: print(f'Conclusion ends on page {i+1}') if any(w in page for w in ['References', 'Bibliography']): lines = [l for l in page.split('\n') if l.strip()] for l in lines[:3]: if 'References' in l or 'Bibliography' in l: print(f'References start on page {i+1}') break "
If Conclusion ends mid-page and References start on the same page, the main body is that page number (e.g., if both are on page 9, main body = ~8.5 pages, which is fine for a 9-page limit since it leaves room for the References header).
If over limit:
Check for orphaned section files not referenced by main.tex:
bash# Find all .tex files in sections/ and check which are \input'ed by main.tex for f in paper/sections/*.tex; do base=$(basename "$f") if ! grep -q "$base" paper/main.tex; then echo "WARNING: $f is not referenced by main.tex — consider removing" fi done
This prevents confusion from leftover files when section structure changes (e.g., old 5_conclusion.tex left behind after restructuring to 7 sections).
For conference submission, additional checks:
bash pdffonts main.pdf | grep -v "yes" # should return nothing (or only header)
\newpage\appendix[VERIFY] markers: search the PDF text for leftover markersmarkdown## Compilation Report - **Status**: SUCCESS / FAILED - **PDF**: paper/main.pdf - **Pages**: X (main body to Conclusion) + Y (references) + Z (appendix) - **Within page limit**: YES/NO (MAX_PAGES = N) - **Errors fixed**: [list of auto-fixed issues] - **Warnings remaining**: [list of non-critical warnings] - **Undefined references**: 0 - **Undefined citations**: 0 ### Next Steps - [ ] Visual inspection of PDF - [ ] Run `/aris-paper-write` to fix any content issues - [ ] Submit to [venue] via OpenReview / CMT / HotCRP
| Venue | Style File | Citation | Page Limit | Refs in limit? | Submission | |-------|-----------|----------|------------|----------------|------------| | ICLR 2026 | iclr2026_conference.sty | natbib (\citep/\citet) | 9 pages (to Conclusion end) | No | OpenReview | | NeurIPS 2025 | neurips_2025.sty | natbib (\citep/\citet) | 9 pages (to Conclusion end) | No | OpenReview | | ICML 2025 | icml2025.sty | natbib (\citep/\citet) | 8 pages (to Conclusion end) | No | OpenReview | | IEEE Journal | IEEEtran.cls journal] | cite (\cite{}, numeric) | ~12-14 pages (Transactions) / ~4-5 (Letters) | Yes | IEEE Author Portal / ScholarOne | | IEEE Conference | IEEEtran.cls conference] | cite (\cite{}, numeric) | 5-8 pages (varies by conf) | Yes | EDAS / IEEE Author Portal |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 17 counted toward the lift figure. The other 5 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 17 comparable cases. 3 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.