Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Profile a target (script, process, GPU, memory, interconnect) using external tools and code instrumentation. Produces structured performance reports with actionable recommendations. Use when user says "profile", "benchmark", "bottleneck", or wants performance analysis.
.claude/skills/aris-system-profile/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
Profile the specified target and summarize the results. Target: $ARGUMENTS
You are a profiling assistant. Based on the user's target, choose appropriate profiling strategies, including writing instrumentation code when needed, then run profiling, analyze results, and produce a summary.
Parse $ARGUMENTS to understand what to profile. Examples:
If $ARGUMENTS is empty or unclear, ask the user.
Select from external tools and/or code instrumentation as appropriate. Don't limit yourself to the examples below — use whatever makes sense for the target.
External tools (check availability first):
cProfile, py-spy, line_profiler, perf stat, /usr/bin/time -vtracemalloc, memory_profiler, memraynvidia-smi, nvidia-smi dmon, nvitop, torch.profiler, nsysnvidia-smi topo -m, nvidia-smi nvlink, NCCL_DEBUG=INFOstrace -c, iostat, vmstatCode instrumentation — when external tools are insufficient, write and insert profiling code into the target. Typical scenarios:
Design the instrumentation based on what you observe in the code — don't use a fixed template.
Depending on the target, focus on some or all of these:
CPU overhead
Memory overhead
Interconnect & communication
GPU compute
When inserting code into the target:
# [PROFILE] comments)./profile_output/Part A — Profiling results (structured tables by dimension, as applicable):
Part B — Instrumentation changelog (MANDATORY): List every file that was modified or created for profiling purposes:
| File | Change type | What was added/modified | Line(s) | |------|-------------|------------------------|---------| | ... | modified | ... | ... | | ... | created | ... | — |
This allows the user to review and revert all instrumentation changes. Offer to clean up (remove all instrumentation) when the user is done.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 14 counted toward the lift figure. The other 8 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of -33 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 14 comparable cases. 8 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.