Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →asgard-ai-platform/grad-elm
Apply the Elaboration Likelihood Model to design persuasion strategies by matching message type to audience elaboration level.
Passed 20 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 9 of 22 without it.
and 9 more in the full report
11 fixed9 passed either way2 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 11 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We are launching a new enterprise security compliance protocol for our software organization. Senior engineering managers care deeply about security risks and have extensive technical background, while junior developers feel overwhelmed by deadlines and lack time to analyze policy details. Please analyze this scenario using the Elaboration Likelihood Model. Formulate an ELM Persuasion Strategy document containing: an Audience Elaboration Assessment table broken down by audience segment (evaluating motivation, ability, and overall elaboration level), the chosen route selection, a Message Design section detailing primary evidence and peripheral cues, a Predicted Outcomes section tracking attitude durability, behavioral impact, and counter-persuasion vulnerability, and a final Risk Mitigation section.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response includes the context header '## ELM Persuasion Strategy:'. | Missed | Passed |
| The response classifies junior developers under low elaboration or peripheral route processing due to high distraction and time constraints. | Passed | Passed |
| The response prescribes evidence-based technical arguments specifically for senior engineering managers. | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
The Elaboration Likelihood Model (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986) proposes that persuasion occurs through two distinct routes depending on the audience's motivation and ability to process a message. The central route relies on careful evaluation of argument quality, producing durable attitude change. The peripheral route relies on heuristic cues (source attractiveness, number of arguments), producing temporary and fragile attitude shifts.
IRON LAW: Attitude change via the central route is MORE durable
and resistant to counter-persuasion — but requires motivation
AND ability to process. When either is absent, only the
peripheral route is available, and its effects decay.
Key assumptions:
| Factor | High Elaboration | Low Elaboration |
|---|---|---|
| Personal relevance | High (topic matters to them) | Low (distant from self) |
test cases passed, vs 9 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.