Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →asgard-ai-platform/grad-sem
Apply Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test hypothesized causal structures by combining measurement models (CFA) and structural models (path analysis).
Passed 19 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 18 of 22 without it.
1 fixed18 passed either way3 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
A test case the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I conducted a survey examining how customer satisfaction and brand trust influence repeat purchase intention. Could you run a structural equation modeling analysis on my dataset? Please organize the output with markdown tables showing factor loadings and validity for the measurement constructs, fit metric evaluations against standard criteria, structural regression relationships between the variables, along with key findings and potential model limitations.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Includes the main section header format starting with '## SEM Analysis:' followed by the study title. | Missed | Passed |
| Structures the measurement model table using columns for Construct, Indicator, Std. Loading, AVE, and CR. | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) simultaneously estimates measurement models (how observed indicators map to latent constructs) and structural models (directional paths among constructs). It integrates confirmatory factor analysis with path analysis to test whether empirical data are consistent with a hypothesized theoretical structure.
IRON LAW: SEM does NOT prove causation — it tests whether data is CONSISTENT
with a hypothesized causal structure. Good fit does NOT mean the model is
correct; it means the model cannot be rejected.
Key assumptions:
Define latent constructs and their observed indicators. Run CFA to confirm factor loadings, assess convergent validity (AVE ≥ 0.50), and discriminant validity.
test cases passed, vs 18 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.