Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Pointer to the canonical agent instruction and skill system for this monorepo
.claude/skills/asymmetric-al-repo-entry/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -39% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -26% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -30% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -47% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -65% | 0% |
This skill is the maintenance entrypoint for the instruction and skill system. Root AGENTS.md already provides ordinary repository orientation.
AGENTS.md, rule/skill routing, or instruction budgets.SKILL.md and you need the full picture.docs/ai/skills/ and must refresh mirrors.AGENTS.md, the nearest scoped instructions, andopenspec/specs/agent-instruction-system/spec.md.
docs/ai/skills/*/SKILL.md and docs/ai/rules/agent-skill-routing.md.docs/ai/skills/, run bun run skills:sync and ensure bun run skills:verify passes before committing..agents/skills/ and be mirrored into .cursor/skills/ and .claude/skills/; use them only when their SKILL.md description matches and they remain subordinate to canonical repo guidance.
docs/ai/skills/<topic>/SKILL.md files loaded per docs/ai/rules/agent-skill-routing.md.docs/ai/skills/ was edited: bun run skills:sync and bun run skills:verify run and clean.docs/ai/skills/find-skills/SKILL.mdopenspec/specs/agent-instruction-system/spec.md| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-17 | fail→pass | 10,248 | 2,845 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,472 | 901 | -39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 4,348 | 2,588 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 206 | 849 | +312% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 4,517 | 6,027 | +33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 227 | 930 | +310% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 3,784 | 6,323 | +67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 279 | 1,010 | +262% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 10,181 | 5,288 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,802 | 1,330 | -26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 12,656 | 5,380 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,270 | 1,585 | -30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 9,500 | 1,984 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,550 | 817 | -47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 16,721 | 3,214 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,665 | 938 | -65% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 8,494 | 4,831 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,592 | 1,338 | -16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 12,260 | 5,170 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,145 | 1,371 | -36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 11,126 | 4,648 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,990 | 1,265 | -36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 7,833 | 4,007 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,272 | 1,199 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 7,558 | 5,335 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,187 | 1,410 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 7,906 | 2,412 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,388 | 828 | -40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 8,412 | 2,601 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,383 | 930 | -33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 9,821 | 5,744 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,659 | 934 | -44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 8,327 | 6,390 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,514 | 1,697 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 7,452 | 3,307 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,224 | 976 | -20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 8,739 | 3,738 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,479 | 1,115 | -25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 12,839 | 4,998 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,032 | 1,216 | -40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 5,281 | 5,390 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 948 | 726 | -23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 6,155 | 6,319 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,168 | 1,579 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 18 counted toward the lift figure. The other 4 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +64 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 18 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
| Model | Method | Date | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | verified | 8/20/2026 | +74% |
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.