Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Applies serverless FaaS patterns for event-driven workloads. Use when designing bursty workloads with minimal infrastructure and pay-per-execution cost model.
.claude/skills/athola-architecture-paradigm-serverless/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 18% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -17% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -3% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -15% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -40% | 0% |
These vocabulary items name the concrete tools and abstractions that show up when the paradigm is implemented. They are not required dependencies and they are not part of the skill's tools: frontmatter (which is reserved for Claude Code tool restrictions). Use this list to disambiguate during architecture discussions.
cloud-sdk: AWS SDK, Google Cloud SDK, or Azure SDK; first-class platform integrationserverless-framework: Serverless Framework, SAM, or CDK; declarative function deploymentIaC-tools: Terraform, Pulumi, or platform-native IaC for shared infrastructure around functionscold-start mitigation approach, and cost projections before any function is deployed.
and its supporting infrastructure, enabling repeatable deploys from scratch.
same outcome and no duplicate side effects (verified by unit test with replayed inputs).
cost per invocation before the function reaches production traffic.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-04 | pass→pass | 17,624 | 13,786 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,551 | 2,756 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 19,539 | 14,732 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,919 | 3,097 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 16,966 | 15,885 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,619 | 3,096 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 30,889 | 19,196 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,990 | 3,857 | -23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 17,147 | 8,524 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,539 | 2,118 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 15,379 | 6,620 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,327 | 1,827 | -21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 16,316 | 11,474 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,459 | 2,376 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 15,190 | 12,113 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,265 | 2,572 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 16,126 | 8,056 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,332 | 2,042 | -12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 15,275 | 10,563 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,290 | 2,415 | +5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 18,744 | 10,774 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,851 | 2,421 | -15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 16,480 | 4,631 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,683 | 1,604 | -40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 9,511 | 4,028 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,482 | 1,428 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 14,224 | 8,024 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,174 | 1,991 | -8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 17,638 | 11,328 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,823 | 2,700 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 19,769 | 10,433 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,141 | 2,376 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 11,117 | 7,600 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,672 | 1,968 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 8,027 | 2,634 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,364 | 1,266 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 9,363 | 3,252 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,512 | 1,329 | -12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 12,597 | 1,979 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,920 | 1,114 | -42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 9,851 | 2,246 | -77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,436 | 1,188 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 9,452 | 4,302 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,280 | 1,401 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +27 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.