Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Polishes working code through successive quality passes in fresh subagents. Use after tests pass when code needs multi-dimension refinement before release.
.claude/skills/athola-dorodango/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 1209% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 67% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -14% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -7% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 24% | 0% |
Named after the Japanese art of polishing a ball of dirt into a high-gloss sphere. Applied to code: take the initial implementation (the "mud ball") and refine it through successive quality passes until it shines.
pass
quality dimensions
skill directly: pensive:code-refinement, etc.)
Four quality dimensions, each a self-contained pass:
See modules/pass-definitions.md for detailed scope of each pass type.
issues_found: 0 marks thatdimension as converged
dimension is not re-run
human with recommendation to split into smaller units
State tracked in .attune/dorodango-state.json:
json{ "target": "plugins/foo", "started_at": "2026-03-18T12:00:00Z", "pass_count": 3, "passes": [ { "type": "correctness", "issues_found": 2, "issues_fixed": 2 }, { "type": "clarity", "issues_found": 5, "issues_fixed": 5 }, { "type": "consistency", "issues_found": 0 } ], "converged_dimensions": ["consistency"], "converged": false }
This file enables resume across sessions. On resume, skip converged dimensions and continue from the next unconverged dimension.
Each pass dispatches a self-contained subagent to prevent context accumulation. The subagent receives:
Subagent dispatch is optional for targets under 100 lines of code; in-session review is sufficient for small files.
stop
pensive:code-refinement - used in clarity passconserve:code-quality-principles - KISS/YAGNI/SOLIDimbue:latent-space-engineering - frame pass promptswith emotional framing for better results
.attune/dorodango-state.json exists with "converged": true and all four dimensions(correctness, clarity, consistency, polish) listed under converged_dimensions.
pass_count in the state file is <= 10; if 10 passes complete without fullconvergence, the skill surfaces the unconverged dimensions to the user with a recommendation to split the target into smaller units.
correctness pass that finds failing tests never marks the dimension as converged.
the state file recording individual pass results rather than a single bulk entry.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-05 | pass→pass | 16,639 | 6,612 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,658 | 1,959 | -26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 7,869 | 6,068 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,204 | 1,326 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 5,348 | 7,390 | +38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 870 | 1,376 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 3,733 | 5,535 | +48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 189 | 1,209 | +540% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 2,994 | 7,042 | +135% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 317 | 1,348 | +325% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 2,805 | 2,220 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 355 | 1,283 | +261% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 3,265 | 19,948 | +511% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 360 | 4,714 | +1209% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 6,186 | 3,715 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 927 | 1,548 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 9,968 | 2,219 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,462 | 1,262 | -14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 9,132 | 1,878 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,384 | 1,282 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 7,205 | 2,665 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,095 | 1,433 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 8,894 | 3,921 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,294 | 1,605 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 8,460 | 4,278 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,380 | 1,743 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 7,603 | 3,033 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,140 | 1,517 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 9,145 | 2,249 | -75% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,360 | 1,332 | -2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 5,571 | 3,581 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 815 | 1,558 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 6,981 | 3,811 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,319 | 1,646 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 5,515 | 2,250 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 909 | 1,309 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 12,488 | 3,662 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,572 | 1,605 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 11,348 | 3,797 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,744 | 1,646 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 13,401 | 1,957 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,014 | 1,273 | -37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 28,098 | 1,707 | -94% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,898 | 1,225 | -35% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 18 counted toward the lift figure. The other 4 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +55 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 18 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.