Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →This skill helps an LLM generate correct AxFlow workflow code using @ax-llm/ax. Use when the user asks about flow(), AxFlow, workflow orchestration, parallel execution, DAG workflows, conditional routing, map/reduce patterns, or multi-node AI pipelines.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 299% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 322% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 217% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 426% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 373% | 0% |
Use this skill to generate AxFlow workflow code. Prefer short, modern, copyable patterns. Do not write tutorial prose unless the user explicitly asks for explanation.
flow() factory, not new AxFlow().import { ai, flow, f } from '@ax-llm/ax';autoParallel: true is the default; independent executes and derives run in parallel when their metadata reads/writes are known and non-conflicting.${nodeName}Result in state..node() before .execute() for that node..returns() (or .r()) as the last step to lock the output type.documentSummarizer, not proc1.userInput, responseText, not text, result.flow() factory syntax for new code.state.${nodeName}Result.${fieldName}..execute() maps current state to node inputs; .map() transforms state without AI calls..returns() maps final state to the flow output type..map().flow<InputType, OutputType>() for typed flows..n() = .node(), .nx() = .nodeExtended(), .m() = .map(), .r() = .returns().typescriptimport { ai, flow } from '@ax-llm/ax'; const llm = ai({ name: 'openai', apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_APIKEY! }); const wf = flow<{ userInput: string }, { responseText: string }>() .node('testNode', 'userInput:string -> responseText:string') .execute('testNode', (state) => ({ userInput: state.userInput })) .returns((state) => ({ responseText: state.testNodeResult.responseText })); const result = await wf.forward(llm, { userInput: 'Hello world' }); console.log(result.responseText);
typescript// Basic const wf = flow(); // With options const wf = flow({ autoParallel: false }); // Typed const wf = flow<InputType, OutputType>(); // Typed with options const wf = flow<InputType, OutputType>({ autoParallel: true, batchSize: 5 });
State grows with each executed node. Results are stored as ${nodeName}Result:
typescript// Initial state: { userInput: 'Hello' } flow.execute('processor', (state) => ({ input: state.userInput })); // State: { userInput: 'Hello', processorResult: { output: '...' } } flow.execute('analyzer', (state) => ({ text: state.processorResult.output })); // State: { ..., analyzerResult: { sentiment: '...', confidence: 0.8 } }
typescript// String signature (creates AxGen automatically) flow.node('processor', 'input:string -> output:string'); // Multiple outputs flow.node('analyzer', 'text:string -> sentiment:string, confidence:number'); // Array outputs flow.node('extractor', 'documentText:string -> entities:string[]'); // Short alias flow.n('processor', 'input:string -> output:string');
Node signatures accept the full extended string grammar — constraint bags, class decisions, optional fields, and nested objects (full modifier table in the ax-signature skill):
typescriptflow .node('triage', 'ticketText:string -> ticketClass:class "bug, billing, question", severityScore:number(min 1, max 5)') .node('draft', 'ticketText:string, ticketClass:string, severityScore:number -> replyText:string(max 400)') .node('audit', 'replyText:string -> approved:boolean, flaggedSpans:object{ spanText:string, reasonNote:string }[]');
class is output-only: a downstream node consuming the decision declares it :string.note?:string), never after the type.toString() serializes these contracts losslessly into %%ax directives, so rich contracts survive the diagram round-trip.Add fields to a base signature without rewriting it:
typescriptimport { f, flow } from '@ax-llm/ax'; // Chain-of-thought reasoning flow.nx('reasoner', 'question:string -> answer:string', { prependOutputs: [ { name: 'reasoning', type: f.internal(f.string('Step-by-step reasoning')) }, ], }); // Add confidence scoring flow.nx('analyzer', 'input:string -> result:string', { appendOutputs: [{ name: 'confidence', type: f.number('Confidence 0-1') }], }); // Add optional context input flow.nx('processor', 'query:string -> response:string', { appendInputs: [{ name: 'context', type: f.optional(f.string('Extra context')) }], });
Extension options: prependInputs, appendInputs, prependOutputs, appendOutputs.
typescriptflow.execute('summarizer', (state) => ({ documentText: state.document })); // With AI override (use a different model for this node) flow.execute('processor', (state) => ({ input: state.data }), { ai: alternativeAI });
Use map() for data shaping without AI calls:
typescript// Sync flow.map((state) => ({ ...state, upperText: state.rawText.toUpperCase() })); // Async flow.map(async (state) => { const data = await fetchFromAPI(state.query); return { ...state, enrichedData: data }; }); // Parallel async transforms flow.map([ async (state) => ({ ...state, result1: await api1(state.data) }), async (state) => ({ ...state, result2: await api2(state.data) }), ], { parallel: true });
typescriptconst wf = flow<{ input: string }>() .map((state) => ({ ...state, upper: state.input.toUpperCase(), len: state.input.length })) .returns((state) => ({ upper: state.upper, isLong: state.len > 20 })); // Result is typed as { upper: string; isLong: boolean } const result = await wf.forward(llm, { input: 'test' });
typescriptconst wf = flow<{ input: string }, { finalResult: string }>() .node('step1', 'input:string -> intermediate:string') .node('step2', 'intermediate:string -> output:string') .execute('step1', (state) => ({ input: state.input })) .execute('step2', (state) => ({ intermediate: state.step1Result.intermediate })) .returns((state) => ({ finalResult: state.step2Result.output }));
Independent execute steps run in parallel automatically (autoParallel: true by default) when their metadata reads/writes are known and non-conflicting:
typescriptconst wf = flow<{ text: string }, { combined: string }>() .node('sentimentAnalyzer', 'text:string -> sentiment:string') .node('topicExtractor', 'text:string -> topics:string[]') .node('entityRecognizer', 'text:string -> entities:string[]') // These three run in parallel (all depend only on state.text) .execute('sentimentAnalyzer', (state) => ({ text: state.text })) .execute('topicExtractor', (state) => ({ text: state.text })) .execute('entityRecognizer', (state) => ({ text: state.text })) // This waits for all three .returns((state) => ({ combined: JSON.stringify({ sentiment: state.sentimentAnalyzerResult.sentiment, topics: state.topicExtractorResult.topics, entities: state.entityRecognizerResult.entities, }), })); // Inspect execution plan const plan = wf.getExecutionPlan(); console.log(plan.parallelGroups, plan.maxParallelism);
Planner rules:
.execute() and .derive() steps may parallelize..map(), .returns(), .branch(), .while(), .feedback(), and explicit .parallel() are barriers.autoParallel: false when you need strict sequential execution.Disable auto-parallel:
typescriptconst wf = flow({ autoParallel: false }); // or per execution: await wf.forward(llm, input, { autoParallel: false });
typescriptconst wf = flow<{ query: string; expertMode: boolean }, { response: string }>() .node('simple', 'query:string -> response:string') .node('expert', 'query:string -> response:string') .branch((state) => state.expertMode) .when(true) .execute('expert', (state) => ({ query: state.query })) .when(false) .execute('simple', (state) => ({ query: state.query })) .merge() .returns((state) => ({ response: state.expertResult?.response ?? state.simpleResult?.response, }));
After .merge(), only the taken branch's result exists; use optional chaining (?.) on untaken branch results.
typescriptconst wf = flow<{ content: string }, { finalContent: string }>() .node('processor', 'content:string -> processedContent:string') .node('qualityChecker', 'content:string -> qualityScore:number') .map((state) => ({ currentContent: state.content, iteration: 0, qualityScore: 0 })) .while((state) => state.iteration < 3 && state.qualityScore < 0.8) .map((state) => ({ ...state, iteration: state.iteration + 1 })) .execute('processor', (state) => ({ content: state.currentContent })) .execute('qualityChecker', (state) => ({ content: state.processorResult.processedContent, })) .map((state) => ({ ...state, currentContent: state.processorResult.processedContent, qualityScore: state.qualityCheckerResult.qualityScore, })) .endWhile() .returns((state) => ({ finalContent: state.currentContent }));
Rules:
.while() needs a matching .endWhile().typescriptconst wf = flow<{ prompt: string }, { result: string }>() .node('gen', 'prompt:string -> result:string, quality:number') .map((state) => ({ ...state, tries: 0 })) .label('retry') .map((state) => ({ ...state, tries: state.tries + 1 })) .execute('gen', (state) => ({ prompt: state.prompt })) .feedback((state) => state.genResult.quality < 0.9 && state.tries < 3, 'retry') .returns((state) => ({ result: state.genResult.result }));
Rules:
.feedback().typescriptflow .parallel([ (sub) => sub.execute('analyzer1', (state) => ({ text: state.input })), (sub) => sub.execute('analyzer2', (state) => ({ text: state.input })), (sub) => sub.execute('analyzer3', (state) => ({ text: state.input })), ]) .merge('combinedResults', (r1, r2, r3) => ({ a1: r1.analyzer1Result.analysis, a2: r2.analyzer2Result.analysis, a3: r3.analyzer3Result.analysis, }));
typescriptconst wf = flow<{ items: string[] }, { processed: string[] }>({ batchSize: 3 }) .derive('processed', 'items', (item, index) => `processed-${item}-${index}`, { batchSize: 2, });
Route nodes to different AI providers:
typescriptconst fast = ai({ name: 'openai', apiKey: '...', config: { model: 'gpt-5.4-mini' } }); const smart = ai({ name: 'anthropic', apiKey: '...' }); const wf = flow<{ text: string }, { out: string }>() .node('draft', 'text:string -> out:string') .node('refine', 'text:string -> out:string') .execute('draft', (state) => ({ text: state.text }), { ai: fast }) .execute('refine', (state) => ({ text: state.draftResult.out }), { ai: smart }) .returns((state) => ({ out: state.refineResult.out }));
typescriptconst wf = flow<{ userQuestion: string }, { responseText: string }>() .node('qa', 'userQuestion:string -> responseText:string') .execute('qa', (state) => ({ userQuestion: state.userQuestion })) .returns((state) => ({ responseText: state.qaResult.responseText })) .description('Question Answerer', 'Answers user questions concisely.'); const fn = wf.toFunction(); // fn.name, fn.parameters (JSON Schema), fn.func
typescriptimport { ai, flow } from '@ax-llm/ax'; import { context, trace } from '@opentelemetry/api'; const tracer = trace.getTracer('axflow'); const llm = ai({ name: 'openai', apiKey: '...' }); const wf = flow<{ userQuestion: string }>() .node('summarizer', 'documentText:string -> summaryText:string') .execute('summarizer', (s) => ({ documentText: s.userQuestion })) .returns((s) => ({ answer: s.summarizerResult.summaryText })); const result = await wf.forward(llm, { userQuestion: 'hi' }, { tracer, traceContext: context.active(), });
Flow tracing also respects live app-wide defaults:
typescriptimport { axGlobals } from '@ax-llm/ax'; import { metrics } from '@opentelemetry/api'; axGlobals.tracer = tracer; axGlobals.meter = metrics.getMeter('axflow'); const result = await wf.forward(llm, { userQuestion: 'hi' });
Rules:
wf.forward(..., { tracer, meter }) overrides flow defaults and axGlobals.axGlobals.AxFlow reads current axGlobals.tracer and axGlobals.meter, creates a parent flow span, and propagates tracer/meter plus trace context to node forwards.axGlobals.abortSignal is merged with flow-level abort signals.typescriptconst wf = flow<{ input: string }>() .node('summarizer', 'text:string -> summary:string') .node('classifier', 'text:string -> category:string'); // Discover program IDs console.log(wf.namedPrograms()); // [{ id: 'root.summarizer', ... }, { id: 'root.classifier', ... }] // Set demos (TypeScript catches typos) wf.setDemos([{ programId: 'root.summarizer', traces: [] }]); // Apply optimization wf.applyOptimization(optimizedProgram);
For tuning a flow, use top-level optimize(wf, train, metric, options) from the ax-gepa skill. There is no separate flow.optimize(...) helper.
AxFlow.getChatLog() returns a flat readonly AxChatLogEntry[] after forward(). Each child-node entry is tagged with entry.name so callers can filter by node:
typescriptconst log = wf.getChatLog(); for (const entry of log) { console.log(entry.name, entry.model); }
typescripttry { const result = await wf.forward(llm, input); } catch (error) { console.error('Flow execution failed:', error); }
Common errors:
"Node 'x' not found" -- define .node() before .execute()."endWhile() without matching while()" -- every .while() needs .endWhile()."when() without matching branch()" -- .when() must be inside .branch()/.merge()."merge() without matching branch()" -- every .branch() needs .merge()."Label 'x' not found" -- define .label() before .feedback() references it.Use ax-mcp for MCP client construction, transport/authentication policy, subscriptions, tasks, event routing, and replay. This section covers how Flow inherits and coordinates the resulting live execution context.
Set mcp/ucp on the flow or a node. Sequential nodes reuse sessions; parallel nodes multiplex through each client's concurrency policy. Branch cancellation and flow aborts propagate to outstanding requests and newly created remote tasks. Structured protocol values stay structured in flow state.
typescriptconst wf = flow({ mcp: [inventory], ucp: [merchant] }) .node('lookup', lookupProgram) .node('checkout', checkoutProgram, { mcpInheritance: ['merchant'] });
A whole flow can be written as (or exported to) a mermaid flowchart. Pass the diagram string straight to flow() — a string argument compiles the AxFlow mermaid dialect into a runnable flow (an options object still constructs an empty builder). String(wf) / wf.toString() renders any flow back, so flow(String(wf)) round-trips.
typescriptimport { flow } from '@ax-llm/ax'; const wf = flow<{ documentText: string }, { finalReport: string }>(` flowchart TD %%ax summarize: documentText:string -> summaryText:string(max 500) %%ax check: summaryText:string -> verdict:class "pass, fail", note?:string %%ax format: summaryText:string, note?:string -> finalReport:string summarize[Summarize document] --> check{verdict} check -->|pass| format check -->|fail, max 3| summarize `); const { finalReport } = await wf.forward(llm, { documentText }); console.log(String(wf)); // render back to the same dialect
Dialect:
%%ax nodeId: <signature> comment directives carry node contracts (mermaid renderers ignore them); the full string-signature grammar applies (? optional on the name, constraint bags, object{ ... }).nodeId{field} names a class decision; its labeled out-edges (-->|pass|) become branches. A back-edge is a loop: -->|label, max N| is feedback, -->|while cond, max N| is a while loop.Render options and bindings:
wf.toString({ direction: 'LR' }) when you need render options; bare String(wf) uses defaults (flowchart TD).bindings supplies closures the dialect can't inline: { nodes: { normalize: (s) => ({...}) }, conditions: { keepGoing: (s) => ... } } for map steps and while conditions.Every diagram below compiles with flow(text) as written (the while loop additionally needs its conditions binding).
Linear pipeline — three nodes auto-wired by field name:
textflowchart TD %%ax extract: contractText:string -> parties:string[], effectiveDate?:string(format date) %%ax summarize: contractText:string, parties:string[] -> summaryText:string(max 300) %%ax redline: summaryText:string -> riskNotes:string(item "one risk")[] extract --> summarize --> redline
Decision branch — a class diamond routes to per-branch responders, then re-joins:
textflowchart TD %%ax classify: requestText:string -> routeClass:class "support, sales" %%ax supportReply: requestText:string -> replyText:string(max 300) %%ax salesReply: requestText:string -> replyText:string(max 300) %%ax send: replyText:string -> deliveredReply:string classify{routeClass} classify -->|support| supportReply classify -->|sales| salesReply supportReply --> send salesReply --> send
Retry loop — a reviewer sends drafts back with a capped revise edge:
textflowchart TD %%ax draft: briefText:string -> articleText:string(max 800) %%ax review: articleText:string -> verdict:class "publish, revise", editorNote?:string %%ax publish: articleText:string, editorNote?:string -> finalPost:string draft --> review{verdict} review -->|publish| publish review -->|revise, max 2| draft
Fan-out / fan-in — two perspectives run in parallel, then a judge joins them:
textflowchart TD %%ax outline: topicText:string -> questionText:string %%ax proponent: questionText:string -> proArgument:string %%ax skeptic: questionText:string -> conArgument:string %%ax judge: proArgument:string, conArgument:string -> verdictSummary:string outline --> proponent & skeptic proponent & skeptic --> judge
While loop — repeat until a host-owned condition says stop (flow(text, { conditions: { keepPolishing } })):
textflowchart TD %%ax polish: draftText:string -> polishedText:string %%ax grade: polishedText:string -> qualityScore:number(min 0, max 1) polish --> grade grade -->|while keepPolishing, max 5| polish
Three-way branch and re-join — triage routes to one of three handlers before delivery:
textflowchart TD %%ax triage: ticketText:string -> ticketClass:class "bug, billing, question" %%ax bugHandler: ticketText:string -> replyText:string(max 300) %%ax billingHandler: ticketText:string -> replyText:string(max 300) %%ax questionHandler: ticketText:string -> replyText:string(max 300) %%ax send: replyText:string -> deliveredReply:string triage{ticketClass} triage -->|bug| bugHandler triage -->|billing| billingHandler triage -->|question| questionHandler bugHandler --> send billingHandler --> send questionHandler --> send
Judge panel — three independent drafts fan out, then converge on one verdict:
textflowchart TD %%ax outline: topicText:string -> outlineText:string %%ax draftA: outlineText:string -> draftAText:string %%ax draftB: outlineText:string -> draftBText:string %%ax draftC: outlineText:string -> draftCText:string %%ax judge: draftAText:string, draftBText:string, draftCText:string -> verdictText:string outline --> draftA & draftB & draftC draftA & draftB & draftC --> judge
Escalation ladder — a quality gate either sends the first answer or falls back to level two:
textflowchart TD %%ax l1Answer: ticketText:string -> answerText:string %%ax qualityGate: answerText:string -> verdict:class "pass, escalate" %%ax l2Answer: ticketText:string -> answerText:string %%ax send: answerText:string -> deliveredAnswer:string l1Answer --> qualityGate{verdict} qualityGate -->|pass| send qualityGate -->|escalate| l2Answer --> send
Itinerary planner — rich contracts stay attached to a simple linear graph:
textflowchart TD %%ax parse: requestText:string -> destinationName:string, stayWindow:dateRange, travelerCount:number(min 1, max 12), budgetUsd?:number(min 0) %%ax plan: destinationName:string, stayWindow:dateRange, travelerCount:number, budgetUsd?:number -> itineraryItems:object{ dayNumber:number(min 1), activityText:string }[] %%ax price: itineraryItems:object{ dayNumber:number, activityText:string }[], travelerCount:number -> estimatedTotalUsd:number(min 0), bookingNotes?:string(max 300) parse --> plan --> price
Fan-out with capped revision — two sections join, then review can send the assembly back twice:
textflowchart TD %%ax outline: briefText:string -> outlineText:string %%ax sectionA: outlineText:string -> sectionAText:string %%ax sectionB: outlineText:string -> sectionBText:string %%ax assemble: sectionAText:string, sectionBText:string -> articleText:string %%ax review: articleText:string -> verdict:class "approve, revise", reviewNote?:string %%ax publish: articleText:string, reviewNote?:string -> publishedArticle:string outline --> sectionA & sectionB sectionA & sectionB --> assemble --> review{verdict} review -->|approve| publish review -->|revise, max 2| assemble
Fetch these for full working code:
An AxFlow is an AxProgrammable event target. The runtime maps an event into the Flow's typed initial state and propagates eventContext, cancellation, and idempotency metadata to every node. Abandoned branches still use normal Flow cancellation semantics.
Task-backed MCP tools called by a Flow node register a continuation on the shared event context. axMCPEventRoutes observes progress and resumes the Flow on input-required or terminal task notifications.
For resource-driven wake, discover the endpoint with inspectCatalog() and give AxMCPEventSource an explicit resourceSubscriptions policy. Managed subscriptions reconcile list changes and reconnect separately from the Flow; subscription alone never starts or resumes a Flow.
UCP lifecycle webhooks use the same continuation boundary through AxUCPWebhookEventSource. Correlate on ucp.checkout or ucp.order only after the signed request has been verified and mapped to application identity.
Use eventTarget('id').program(flow).wakeInput(...).resumeInput(...) when wake and resume events have different shapes. Segment-safe eventPath mappings are validated against the Flow signature before any node executes; a declarative .waitFor(kind, path) creates the owned continuation consumed by the resume route.
Reusable eventInput() plans are the preferred callback-free boundary. Callback mapInput is normalized against the Flow signature before any node runs. In generated hosts, immediate publications dispatch inline; the host uses nextDueAt() and runDue() for delayed retries, debounce, and continuation expiry.
new AxFlow(...) for new code..node()..mapOutput() or .mo()..returns() for the final output contract.text, result, data, input, output..map()..merge().Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.