Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Plan, create, and configure production-ready Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) clusters. Covers Day-0 checklist, SKU selection (Automatic vs Standard), networking options (private API server, Azure CNI Overlay, egress configuration), security, and operations (autoscaling, upgrade strategy, cost analysis). WHEN: create AKS environment, provision AKS, enable AKS observability, design AKS networking, choose AKS SKU, secure AKS, optimize AKS, AKS spot nodes, AKS cluster-autoscaler, rightsize AKS pod, p
.claude/skills/azure-kubernetes/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
> AUTHORITATIVE GUIDANCE — MANDATORY COMPLIANCE > > This skill produces a recommended AKS cluster configuration based on user requirements, distinguishing Day-0 decisions (networking, API server — hard to change later) from Day-1 features (can enable post-creation). See CLI reference for commands.
| Property | Value | |----------|-------| | Best for | AKS cluster planning and Day-0 decisions | | MCP Tools | mcp_azure_mcp_aks | | CLI | az aks create, az aks show, kubectl get, kubectl describe | | Related skills | azure-diagnostics (troubleshooting AKS), azure-validate (readiness checks), azure-kubernetes-automatic-readiness (migrate existing cluster to AKS Automatic) |
Activate this skill when user wants to:
azure MCP server and select mcp_azure_mcp_aks first to discover the exact AKS-specific MCP tools surfaced by the client. Choose the smallest discovered AKS tool that fits the task, and fall back to Azure CLI (az aks) only when the needed functionality is not exposed through the AKS MCP surface.If the user is unsure, use safe defaults.
Pod IP Model (Key Day-0 decision):
Dataplane & Network Policy:
Egress:
Ingress:
DNS:
--node-osdisk-type Ephemeral) for faster node startupCriticalAddonsOnly)--zones 1 2 3)az aks stop/startDeep-dive scenarios — load only the relevant reference file:
| Scenario | Trigger Keywords | Reference | |----------|-----------------|-----------| | Pod Rightsizing | over-provisioned pods, CPU requests, memory requests, rightsize workloads | azure-aks-rightsizing.md | | VPA Setup | vertical pod autoscaler, VPA recommendations, VPA enable | azure-aks-vpa.md | | Cluster Autoscaler | idle nodes, CAS off, enable autoscaler, scale-down profile, node utilization | azure-aks-autoscaler.md | | Spot Node Pools | Spot VMs, Spot nodes, batch workloads, cheaper nodes | azure-aks-spot.md |
> Disambiguation: If a prompt matches multiple rows (e.g., "cheaper nodes" could suggest both Spot and autoscaler), prefer the most specific match. If ambiguous, ask the user to clarify their intent before loading a reference file.
az account show / az account list so the agent can resolve context without exposing identifiers.| Tool | Purpose | Key Parameters | |------|---------|----------------| | mcp_azure_mcp_aks | AKS MCP entry point used to discover the exact AKS-specific tools exposed by the client | Discover the callable AKS tool first, then use that tool's parameters |
| Error / Symptom | Likely Cause | Remediation | |-----------------|--------------|-------------| | MCP tool call fails or times out | Invalid credentials, subscription, or AKS context | Verify az login, confirm the active subscription context with az account show, and check the target resource group without echoing subscription identifiers back to the user | | Quota exceeded | Regional vCPU or resource limits | Request quota increase or select different region/VM SKU | | Networking conflict (IP exhaustion) | Pod subnet too small for overlay/CNI | Re-plan IP ranges; may require cluster recreation (Day-0) | | Workload Identity not working | Missing OIDC issuer or federated credential | Enable --enable-oidc-issuer --enable-workload-identity, configure federated identity |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 20 counted toward the lift figure. The other 2 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +14 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 20 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.