Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →bartsoj/TRIAGE.md
Analyze system verification failures, trace each to its originating design artifact, group related issues into fix batches, and produce an actionable fix plan.
Passed 17 of 20 test cases with the skill, and 10 of 20 without it.
and 11 more in the full report
8 fixed11 passed either way3 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
During integration testing, the web server crashed on startup with a database SSL handshake error because `pg` driver requires `ssl: { rejectUnauthorized: false }` for local staging, which was omitted in `ARCHITECTURE.md` § Database Conventions. What category and root artifact apply?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The failure is categorized as a third-party library issue. | Missed | Passed |
| The root artifact is identified as ARCHITECTURE.md § Database Conventions. | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Given a SYSTEM_VERIFICATION.md (or equivalent failure report) documenting integration failures in a composed application, produce a TRIAGE.md that traces every failure to the specific design artifact that, if correct, would have prevented the bug — then groups related issues into ordered fix batches and provides specific artifact update instructions. The output enables a human to update the right documents (architecture, interface contract, specs) so the pipeline can re-run and produce correct implementations.
units/<area>/ folder structure (auto-discovered) — the existing per-area unit catalog. Used to identify gaps where no unit covers a needed capability; missing capabilities become candidates for new triggers (roadmap/<NNN>-<slug>/ROADMAP.md or issues/<NNN>-<slug>/ISSUE.md).Triage proceeds in four phases: failure analysis, artifact tracing, batch grouping, and fix plan generation.
Read the system verification report and build a complete picture of every failure.
For each failure:
| Category | What went wrong | Typical artifact gap |
|---|---|---|
| Contract mismatch | Client and server disagree on wire format — field names, casing, structure, types | INTERFACES.md missing or incorrect entry; SPEC derived wire format from prose instead of interface contract |
| Missing configuration | Env var, migration, library setup, dev script not present | SPEC for infrastructure/scaffold unit incomplete; ARCHITECTURE.md missing config section |
| Logic bug | Code does the wrong thing despite correct contracts | SPEC was wrong (spec bug) or IMPLEMENTATION deviated from spec (implementation bug) |
test cases passed, vs 10 / 20 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.