Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Compare how two harbor benchmark runs performed on a single shared task
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 92% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 113% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 104% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 76% | 0% |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 243% | 0% |
Use when given two harbor run names and a task name, and the goal is to understand why the two runs differ on that task — not just that they differ.
RUN_A: harbor run name (e.g. sonnet46-full)RUN_B: harbor run name (e.g. pi-sonnet46-full)TASK: bare task name (e.g. extract-elf, not terminal-bench/extract-elf)RUNS_DIR: defaults to evals/harbor/runs/ relative to the repo rootHarbor 0.8 names trial dirs <task>__<random-suffix> (e.g. extract-elf__bU3GHs4), not <task>.1. The suffix is unique per trial, so don't guess it — discover it from disk:
bashTRIAL_A_DIR=$(ls -d "$RUNS_DIR/$RUN_A/${TASK}__"*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1) TRIAL_B_DIR=$(ls -d "$RUNS_DIR/$RUN_B/${TASK}__"*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1)
If either is empty, that run didn't include this task — stop and say so. (ls "$RUNS_DIR/$RUN_A/" shows what's there.)
If you want to confirm the match, every result.json carries task_name and trial_name:
bashjq '{task_name, trial_name}' "$TRIAL_A_DIR/result.json"
The fastest path is to let cmd.py task do it for you — it already prints status, reward, duration, tokens, turns, cost, error class, and the tail of the verifier stdout:
bash./evals/harbor/cmd.py task "$RUN_A" "$TASK" ./evals/harbor/cmd.py task "$RUN_B" "$TASK"
Only drop to raw jq against result.json if you need a field cmd.py task doesn't print. The actual shape (harbor 0.8 TrialResult):
bashjq '{ reward: (.verifier_result.rewards.reward // (.verifier_result.rewards | to_entries | .[0].value) // null), rewards_all: .verifier_result.rewards, duration_seconds: ((.finished_at | fromdateiso8601) - (.started_at | fromdateiso8601)), input_tokens: .agent_result.n_input_tokens, cache_tokens: .agent_result.n_cache_tokens, output_tokens: .agent_result.n_output_tokens, cost_usd: .agent_result.cost_usd, error_type: .exception_info.exception_type, error_message: (.exception_info.exception_message // "" | split("\n")[0]) }' "$TRIAL_A_DIR/result.json"
The reward fallback mirrors reporter.trial_reward: if the verifier didn't use the conventional reward key, take the first value in the rewards map.
Derive status from those:
pass if reward >= 1.0partial if reward > 0 (and < 1)fail if reward == 0timeout if reward is 0/null and error_type contains "timeout"error if reward is 0/null and error_type is set (non-timeout)no-reward if neither verifier_result.rewards nor exception_info is setReward wins over errors: harbor can record an AgentTimeoutError after the verifier already scored a pass (the agent finished the work then the harness timed out during teardown, or it timed out after writing the correct answer). If we got points, count them. See reporter.trial_status for the canonical rule.
Several agent_result fields can be null depending on the harness (notably n_cache_tokens, n_output_tokens, cost_usd on some goose runs). Don't treat that as a failure — just omit those facts from the comparison if missing on either side. cmd.py task already applies harbor's fallbacks (reading goose's complete event from agent/goose.txt when the structured field is null), so its numbers are the right ones to report.
The task definitions are NOT in the harbor Python package. They are plain text files on disk, in harbor's task cache. Do not run find / or pip show harbor — that is the wrong direction.
Harbor caches under ~/.cache/harbor/ on every platform (it uses Path("~/.cache/harbor").expanduser() unconditionally — there is no ~/Library/Caches/harbor on macOS, despite what you might expect).
The on-disk layout for package-backed tasks (the common case — everything in terminal-bench/terminal-bench-2 lands here) is:
~/.cache/harbor/tasks/packages/<org>/<task>/<digest>/Note: no dataset name in the path. Tasks are keyed by org + task name + content digest, not by which dataset pulled them. The <digest> segment changes when the task is republished, so discover the dir rather than hardcoding:
bashTASK_DIR=$(ls -d ~/.cache/harbor/tasks/packages/terminal-bench/"$TASK"/*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1) echo "$TASK_DIR" ls "$TASK_DIR"
If that's empty, the task could be from a different org or a git source — broaden the search. find returns the parent (one level above the digest), so descend one more level. Guard against $PARENT being empty, otherwise the glob expands to /*/ and matches the filesystem root:
bashPARENT=$(find ~/.cache/harbor/tasks -type d -name "$TASK" 2>/dev/null | head -1) if [ -n "$PARENT" ]; then TASK_DIR=$(ls -d "$PARENT"/*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1) fi
If both lookups come up empty, the task hasn't been downloaded on this machine — bail out and report that, rather than guessing. (Runs sync via cmd.py pull but the task cache does not, so a machine that only inspects results may never have the spec locally.)
~/.cache/harbor/datasets/ exists too but holds dataset-level metadata, not the per-task instruction.md / tests/ / solution/ files — not what you want here.
Inside, you care about three files:
instruction.md — exactly what the agent was asked to dotests/test_outputs.py (or sometimes run-tests.sh) — what the verifieractually checks, line by line
solution/solution.sh — the reference correct answerWithout all three you can't tell whether a wrong answer was a misread, a shallow bug, or a verifier surprise. Quote the assertion that failed when you describe a failure — paraphrasing is how wrong conclusions sneak in.
Two sources, prefer the first when present:
$TRIAL_DIR/agent/trajectory.json — harbor's ATIF format, one entry peragent step. jq '.steps[] | {step_id, source, message, tool_calls: [.tool_calls[]?.function_name]}' gives a compact view. Most current runs have it; some older harness versions may not.
$TRIAL_DIR/agent/<harness>.txt — raw stream-json or log. The filenamematches the harness (commonly goose.txt or pi.txt; other harnesses use their own name). Don't guess — run ls "$TRIAL_DIR/agent/" and use whatever .txt file is there.
Skim, don't quote in full. For each agent identify:
headers")
modified)
had gone in circles
$TRIAL_DIR/verifier/ typically contains:
test-stdout.txt — the verifier's full stdout (assertion failures, pytestoutput, etc.). This is usually the most diagnostic file.
reward.txt — the scalar reward as a string.ctrf.json — structured test results in CTRF format, useful if you wantper-assertion pass/fail without grepping stdout.
bashtail -50 "$TRIAL_DIR/verifier/test-stdout.txt"
This is often more diagnostic than the agent log — it tells you exactly which assertion failed and what the agent's output was at that point.
Output markdown with these sections in order:
meaningful, omitting fields that are null on either side).
smarter" but "B's script used nm -n so its addresses matched the verifier's ground truth, A's script used PIE-relocated virtual addresses which the verifier doesn't normalize".
probably affects other tasks, or a one-off accident of this verifier? Skip if unclear from one task.
./evals/harbor/cmd.py task <run> <task> for the headline numbersls -d to discover the <task>__<suffix> trial directoriesjq for any result.json field cmd.py task doesn't print$TRIAL_DIR/agent/ and $TRIAL_DIR/verifier/find ~/.cache/harbor/tasks to locate the task specNo Python imports, no harbor package required. Everything you need is on disk as JSON / text files.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.