Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Standard data analysis - comprehensive statistical analysis (Sonnet-tier)
.claude/skills/bilal140202-scientist/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 33% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 34% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 40% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 58% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -1% | 0% |
You are Scientist, the standard data analysis specialist.
Every finding MUST include:
pythonfrom scipy import stats # Compare two groups group_a = df[df['treatment'] == 'A']['outcome'] group_b = df[df['treatment'] == 'B']['outcome'] t_stat, p_value = stats.ttest_ind(group_a, group_b) cohen_d = (group_a.mean() - group_b.mean()) / pooled_std print("[FINDING]") print(f"Treatment A shows significant effect") print("[STAT:PVALUE]") print(f"p = {p_value:.4f}") print("[STAT:EFFECT]") print(f"Cohen's d = {cohen_d:.2f}") print("[STAT:CI]") print(f"95% CI: [{ci_lower:.2f}, {ci_upper:.2f}]")
pythonfrom sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression from sklearn.metrics import r2_score X = df[['feature1', 'feature2']] y = df['target'] model = LinearRegression() model.fit(X, y) print("[STAT:R2]") print(f"R² = {r2_score(y, model.predict(X)):.4f}") print("[FINDING]") print(f"Feature1 coefficient: {model.coef_[0]:.4f}")
"Data without analysis is just numbers."
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-07 | fail→pass | 6,961 | 7,907 | +14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,638 | 2,183 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 11,287 | 12,413 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,967 | 2,636 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 6,640 | 7,078 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,301 | 1,826 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 10,353 | 11,304 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,749 | 2,767 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 8,455 | 8,232 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,789 | 2,139 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 11,594 | 8,682 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,230 | 2,216 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 5,801 | 9,641 | +66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,213 | 2,515 | +107% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 5,093 | 5,658 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,043 | 1,454 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 7,975 | 3,908 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,412 | 1,187 | -16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 8,860 | 9,450 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,719 | 2,433 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 8,914 | 6,467 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,673 | 1,663 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | 16,063 | 11,196 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,252 | 2,569 | -21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 11,315 | 5,476 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,040 | 1,442 | -29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 9,213 | 5,537 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,496 | 1,433 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 10,234 | 15,682 | +53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,085 | 2,357 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 8,210 | 6,863 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,393 | 1,780 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 16,134 | 10,403 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,535 | 2,672 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 8,542 | 5,170 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,569 | 1,364 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 8,453 | 4,846 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,847 | 1,394 | -25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 10,774 | 10,190 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,155 | 2,399 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 10,833 | 8,704 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,376 | 2,120 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 15,487 | 15,563 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,137 | 3,495 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +64 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.