Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Predicts ADMET properties using ADMETlab 3.0 API or DeepChem models. Estimates bioavailability, CYP inhibition, hERG liability, and 119 toxicity endpoints with uncertainty quantification. Filters for PAINS and other structural alerts. Use when filtering compounds for drug-likeness or prioritizing leads by predicted safety.
.claude/skills/bio-admet-prediction/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
| case-02 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: RDKit 2024.03+, pandas 2.2+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signaturesIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Predict the drug-likeness and toxicity of my compounds" → Estimate ADMET properties (bioavailability, CYP inhibition, hERG liability, toxicity) for candidate molecules using the ADMETlab 3.0 API or RDKit PAINS/structural alert filters, producing a safety/drugability profile for lead prioritization.
requests, FilterCatalog for PAINS (RDKit)Predict absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity properties.
Goal: Predict ADMET properties for a batch of compounds using a web API.
Approach: Submit SMILES to the ADMETlab 3.0 REST endpoint and parse the returned JSON into a DataFrame of 119 endpoint predictions with uncertainty estimates.
ADMETlab 3.0 provides 119 endpoints with uncertainty estimates.
pythonimport requests import pandas as pd def predict_admet_batch(smiles_list, api_url='https://admetlab3.scbdd.com/api/predict'): ''' Predict ADMET properties using ADMETlab 3.0 API. Note: SwissADME has NO API - it is web-only. ''' payload = { 'smiles': smiles_list } response = requests.post(api_url, json=payload) response.raise_for_status() return pd.DataFrame(response.json()) # Example usage # smiles = ['CCO', 'c1ccccc1O', 'CC(=O)Oc1ccccc1C(=O)O'] # results = predict_admet_batch(smiles)
| Category | Endpoints | Thresholds | |----------|-----------|------------| | Absorption | Caco-2, HIA, Pgp substrate | HIA > 30% | | Distribution | BBB penetration, PPB, VDss | BBB+: penetrates | | Metabolism | CYP inhibition (1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 3A4) | Inhibitor threshold | | Excretion | Clearance, Half-life | - | | Toxicity | hERG, AMES, hepatotoxicity, carcinogenicity | hERG IC50 > 10 μM |
DeepChem supports both PyTorch and TensorFlow backends.
pythonimport deepchem as dc # Load pre-trained toxicity model tox21_tasks, tox21_datasets, transformers = dc.molnet.load_tox21() train_dataset, valid_dataset, test_dataset = tox21_datasets # Featurize new molecules featurizer = dc.feat.CircularFingerprint(size=1024) smiles = ['CCO', 'c1ccccc1'] features = featurizer.featurize(smiles) # Load trained model model = dc.models.GraphConvModel( n_tasks=12, mode='classification', model_dir='tox21_model' ) # Predict (after training/loading) # predictions = model.predict_on_batch(features)
Goal: Remove pan-assay interference compounds that produce false positives in biological screens.
Approach: Build a PAINS FilterCatalog and test each molecule; compounds matching any PAINS pattern are flagged and separated from clean compounds.
pythonfrom rdkit.Chem.FilterCatalog import FilterCatalog, FilterCatalogParams def filter_pains(molecules): ''' Filter out PAINS (pan-assay interference compounds). These are promiscuous compounds that give false positives in assays. ''' params = FilterCatalogParams() params.AddCatalog(FilterCatalogParams.FilterCatalogs.PAINS) catalog = FilterCatalog(params) clean = [] flagged = [] for mol in molecules: if mol is None: continue entry = catalog.GetFirstMatch(mol) if entry is None: clean.append(mol) else: flagged.append((mol, entry.GetDescription())) print(f'Clean: {len(clean)}, PAINS flagged: {len(flagged)}') return clean, flagged # Other filter catalogs available: # FilterCatalogs.BRENK - Brenk structural alerts # FilterCatalogs.NIH - NIH structural alerts # FilterCatalogs.ZINC - ZINC clean leads
Goal: Assess drug-likeness of a molecule using multiple criteria beyond Lipinski Rule of 5.
Approach: Calculate Lipinski properties (MW, LogP, HBD, HBA), count violations, check Veber oral bioavailability criteria (rotatable bonds, TPSA), and compute QED score.
pythonfrom rdkit import Chem from rdkit.Chem import Descriptors, Lipinski, QED def calculate_druglikeness(mol): ''' Calculate multiple drug-likeness criteria. ''' if mol is None: return None props = { # Lipinski Rule of 5 'MW': Descriptors.MolWt(mol), 'LogP': Descriptors.MolLogP(mol), 'HBD': Lipinski.NumHDonors(mol), 'HBA': Lipinski.NumHAcceptors(mol), # Additional properties 'TPSA': Descriptors.TPSA(mol), 'RotatableBonds': Lipinski.NumRotatableBonds(mol), 'AromaticRings': Lipinski.NumAromaticRings(mol), # QED (quantitative estimate of drug-likeness) # 0-1 scale, > 0.5 generally drug-like 'QED': QED.qed(mol) } # Lipinski violations violations = 0 if props['MW'] > 500: violations += 1 if props['LogP'] > 5: violations += 1 if props['HBD'] > 5: violations += 1 if props['HBA'] > 10: violations += 1 props['LipinskiViolations'] = violations # Veber criteria (oral bioavailability) # RotatableBonds <= 10, TPSA <= 140 props['VeberCompliant'] = (props['RotatableBonds'] <= 10 and props['TPSA'] <= 140) return props
Goal: Rank compounds through a multi-stage ADMET filter to identify drug-like leads.
Approach: Apply sequential Lipinski, Veber, and QED filters to progressively eliminate compounds that fail drug-likeness criteria.
pythondef prioritize_compounds(molecules): ''' Multi-stage ADMET filtering pipeline. ''' results = [] for mol in molecules: if mol is None: continue props = calculate_druglikeness(mol) if props is None: continue # Stage 1: Lipinski filter if props['LipinskiViolations'] > 1: continue # Stage 2: Additional filters if not props['VeberCompliant']: continue # Stage 3: QED cutoff if props['QED'] < 0.5: continue results.append((mol, props)) return results
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +14 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.