Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Test whether two traits share a causal variant at a genomic locus using Bayesian colocalization with coloc. Computes posterior probabilities for shared vs distinct causal variants between GWAS and eQTL signals. Use when determining if a GWAS signal and an eQTL share the same causal variant.
.claude/skills/bio-causal-genomics-colocalization-analysis/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: ggplot2 3.5+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
packageVersion('<pkg>') then ?function_name to verify parametersIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Test whether my GWAS signal and eQTL share the same causal variant" → Compute Bayesian posterior probabilities for five colocalization hypotheses (no association, trait-1-only, trait-2-only, distinct causal variants, shared causal variant) to distinguish true causal overlap from LD-driven coincidence.
coloc::coloc.abf() for approximate Bayes factor colocalizationColocalization tests whether two association signals at the same locus are driven by the same causal variant. This distinguishes shared causality from coincidental overlap due to LD.
Five hypotheses tested by coloc:
Goal: Test whether two traits share a causal variant at a GWAS locus using Bayesian colocalization.
Approach: Format summary statistics for each trait as named lists, run coloc.abf to compute posterior probabilities for five hypotheses (H0-H4), and interpret PP.H4 as evidence for a shared causal variant.
rlibrary(coloc) # --- Input format: named list with GWAS summary stats --- # Required fields: beta, varbeta, snp, position, type, N # type = 'quant' (continuous) or 'cc' (case-control) gwas_data <- list( beta = gwas_df$BETA, varbeta = gwas_df$SE^2, snp = gwas_df$SNP, position = gwas_df$POS, type = 'cc', # Case-control study s = 0.3, # Proportion of cases (required for cc) N = 50000 # Total sample size ) eqtl_data <- list( beta = eqtl_df$BETA, varbeta = eqtl_df$SE^2, snp = eqtl_df$SNP, position = eqtl_df$POS, type = 'quant', # Quantitative trait (expression) N = 500, # eQTL sample size sdY = 1 # SD of trait (1 if already normalized) ) # --- Run colocalization --- result <- coloc.abf(dataset1 = gwas_data, dataset2 = eqtl_data) # Posterior probabilities # PP.H4 > 0.8: Strong evidence for colocalization (shared variant) # PP.H3 > 0.8: Distinct causal variants at the locus # PP.H4 between 0.5-0.8: Suggestive but inconclusive print(result$summary)
r# Default priors: p1 = 1e-4, p2 = 1e-4, p12 = 1e-5 # p1: Prior probability a SNP is associated with trait 1 # p2: Prior probability a SNP is associated with trait 2 # p12: Prior probability a SNP is associated with both traits # # Ratio p12/p1 represents prior belief in colocalization # Default: p12/p1 = 0.1 (10% of trait 1 SNPs also affect trait 2) result_sensitive <- coloc.abf( dataset1 = gwas_data, dataset2 = eqtl_data, p1 = 1e-4, p2 = 1e-4, p12 = 5e-6 # More conservative prior for shared association ) # Sensitivity analysis across prior values sensitivity(result, 'H4 > 0.8')
r# When only p-values are available, use MAF to approximate gwas_pval <- list( pvalues = gwas_df$P, MAF = gwas_df$MAF, snp = gwas_df$SNP, position = gwas_df$POS, type = 'cc', s = 0.3, N = 50000 ) result <- coloc.abf(dataset1 = gwas_pval, dataset2 = eqtl_data)
Goal: Test colocalization at loci with multiple independent causal signals.
Approach: Run SuSiE fine-mapping on each dataset to identify credible sets, then test colocalization between all pairs of credible sets using coloc.susie.
rlibrary(coloc) library(susieR) # coloc.abf assumes a single causal variant per locus # SuSiE-coloc handles multiple causal variants # LD matrix required (correlation matrix from reference panel) ld_matrix <- as.matrix(read.table('ld_matrix.txt')) # Run SuSiE on each dataset susie_gwas <- runsusie( list(beta = gwas_df$BETA, varbeta = gwas_df$SE^2, snp = gwas_df$SNP, position = gwas_df$POS, type = 'cc', s = 0.3, N = 50000, LD = ld_matrix), L = 10 # Max number of causal variants to search for ) susie_eqtl <- runsusie( list(beta = eqtl_df$BETA, varbeta = eqtl_df$SE^2, snp = eqtl_df$SNP, position = eqtl_df$POS, type = 'quant', N = 500, sdY = 1, LD = ld_matrix), L = 10 ) # Coloc using SuSiE credible sets result_susie <- coloc.susie(susie_gwas, susie_eqtl) print(result_susie$summary) # Each row tests colocalization between a pair of credible sets # hit1, hit2: Credible set indices from dataset 1 and 2
Goal: Test colocalization across three or more traits simultaneously to identify shared causal variant clusters.
Approach: Provide beta and SE matrices (SNPs x traits) to hyprcoloc, which clusters traits sharing a causal variant using a branch-and-bound algorithm.
r# install.packages('remotes') # remotes::install_github('jrs95/hyprcoloc') library(hyprcoloc) # Test colocalization across multiple traits simultaneously # Input: matrices of betas and SEs (rows = SNPs, columns = traits) betas <- cbind(gwas_df$BETA, eqtl1_df$BETA, eqtl2_df$BETA) ses <- cbind(gwas_df$SE, eqtl1_df$SE, eqtl2_df$SE) colnames(betas) <- colnames(ses) <- c('GWAS', 'eQTL_gene1', 'eQTL_gene2') rownames(betas) <- rownames(ses) <- gwas_df$SNP result_hypr <- hyprcoloc( effect.est = betas, effect.se = ses, trait.names = colnames(betas), snp.id = rownames(betas) ) # Output: clusters of traits sharing a causal variant print(result_hypr$results)
r# --- Extract a locus (1 Mb window around lead SNP) --- extract_locus <- function(sumstats, lead_snp_pos, chr, window = 500000) { locus <- sumstats[sumstats$CHR == chr & sumstats$POS >= (lead_snp_pos - window) & sumstats$POS <= (lead_snp_pos + window), ] locus[order(locus$POS), ] } # --- Generate LD matrix from plink --- # plink --bfile ref_panel --chr 6 --from-bp 30000000 --to-bp 31000000 \ # --r square --out ld_matrix # Read into R: ld <- as.matrix(read.table('ld_matrix.ld'))
rlibrary(ggplot2) plot_coloc_locus <- function(gwas_df, eqtl_df, result) { pp4 <- round(result$summary['PP.H4.abf'], 3) p1 <- ggplot(gwas_df, aes(x = POS / 1e6, y = -log10(P))) + geom_point(alpha = 0.6) + labs(x = 'Position (Mb)', y = '-log10(P)', title = paste('GWAS | PP.H4 =', pp4)) + theme_minimal() p2 <- ggplot(eqtl_df, aes(x = POS / 1e6, y = -log10(P))) + geom_point(alpha = 0.6, color = 'steelblue') + labs(x = 'Position (Mb)', y = '-log10(P)', title = 'eQTL') + theme_minimal() library(patchwork) p1 / p2 }
r# LocusCompare: scatter of -log10(P) for GWAS vs eQTL at shared SNPs plot_locuscompare <- function(gwas_df, eqtl_df) { merged <- merge( gwas_df[, c('SNP', 'P')], eqtl_df[, c('SNP', 'P')], by = 'SNP', suffixes = c('.gwas', '.eqtl') ) ggplot(merged, aes(x = -log10(P.gwas), y = -log10(P.eqtl))) + geom_point(alpha = 0.5) + geom_smooth(method = 'lm', se = FALSE, linetype = 'dashed', color = 'grey50') + labs(x = '-log10(P) GWAS', y = '-log10(P) eQTL', title = 'LocusCompare') + theme_minimal() }
PP.H4 > 0.8: Strong colocalization -- traits share a causal variant
PP.H3 > 0.8: Distinct causal variants -- LD-driven overlap, not shared causality
PP.H4 0.5-0.8: Suggestive -- increase sample size, try SuSiE-coloc
PP.H0/H1/H2 dominant: Insufficient signal at this locusCommon pitfalls:
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +27 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.