Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Detects somatic mutations in circulating tumor DNA using variant callers optimized for low allele fractions with UMI-based error suppression. Reliably detects mutations at VAF above 0.5 percent using consensus-based approaches. Use when identifying tumor mutations from plasma DNA or tracking specific variants.
.claude/skills/bio-ctdna-mutation-detection/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: Ensembl VEP 111+, SnpEff 5.2+, VarDict 1.8+, pandas 2.2+, pysam 0.22+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures<tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flagsIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Detect mutations in my cfDNA sample" → Identify somatic variants at low allele fractions (0.1-1%) from cell-free DNA using error-suppressed consensus calling and specialized callers.
vardict-java for low-VAF variant calling from cfDNADetect somatic mutations in cfDNA at low variant allele fractions.
| Requirement | Specification | |-------------|---------------| | Data type | Targeted panel or WES (NOT sWGS) | | Depth | >= 1000x for low VAF detection | | UMIs | Highly recommended for < 1% VAF | | Input | Preprocessed BAM (UMI consensus if available) |
| VAF Range | Reliability | Notes | |-----------|-------------|-------| | > 1% | Reliable | Standard callers work | | 0.5-1% | Good with UMIs | Requires error suppression | | 0.1-0.5% | Challenging | Needs deep UMI consensus | | < 0.1% | Unreliable | Near noise floor |
bash# VarDict is highly sensitive for low VAF # Use on UMI-consensus BAM for best results vardict-java \ -G reference.fa \ -f 0.005 \ # Min VAF 0.5% -N sample_id \ -b sample.bam \ -c 1 -S 2 -E 3 -g 4 \ regions.bed | \ teststrandbias.R | \ var2vcf_valid.pl \ -N sample_id \ -E \ -f 0.005 \ > sample.vcf
pythonimport subprocess import pandas as pd import pysam def call_variants_vardict(bam_file, reference, bed_file, output_vcf, min_vaf=0.005, min_depth=100): ''' Call variants with VarDict. Args: bam_file: UMI-consensus BAM preferred reference: Reference FASTA bed_file: Target regions BED output_vcf: Output VCF path min_vaf: Minimum VAF (0.005 = 0.5%) min_depth: Minimum read depth ''' sample_id = bam_file.split('/')[-1].replace('.bam', '') cmd = f''' vardict-java \ -G {reference} \ -f {min_vaf} \ -N {sample_id} \ -b {bam_file} \ -c 1 -S 2 -E 3 -g 4 \ {bed_file} | \ teststrandbias.R | \ var2vcf_valid.pl \ -N {sample_id} \ -E \ -f {min_vaf} \ > {output_vcf} ''' subprocess.run(cmd, shell=True, check=True) return output_vcf def filter_ctdna_variants(vcf_file, chip_genes=None): ''' Filter ctDNA variants, removing CHIP. CHIP genes commonly mutated in elderly: DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, PPM1D, TP53, SF3B1, etc. ''' if chip_genes is None: chip_genes = ['DNMT3A', 'TET2', 'ASXL1', 'PPM1D', 'JAK2', 'SF3B1', 'SRSF2', 'TP53', 'CBL', 'BCOR'] import vcfpy reader = vcfpy.Reader.from_path(vcf_file) somatic = [] chip = [] for record in reader: gene = record.INFO.get('GENE', [''])[0] if gene in chip_genes: chip.append(record) else: somatic.append(record) print(f'Somatic variants: {len(somatic)}') print(f'Potential CHIP variants: {len(chip)}') return somatic, chip
pythondef call_with_umi_varcal(bam_file, reference, bed_file, output_vcf, min_vaf=0.005): ''' UMI-VarCal: Best specificity with UMI data. ''' subprocess.run([ 'umi-varcal', '--bam', bam_file, '--ref', reference, '--bed', bed_file, '--out', output_vcf, '--min-vaf', str(min_vaf), '--min-alt-reads', '3', '--min-depth', '100' ], check=True)
pythondef annotate_ctdna_variants(vcf_file, output_vcf): '''Annotate variants with clinically relevant information.''' # Use VEP or snpEff for annotation subprocess.run([ 'vep', '--input_file', vcf_file, '--output_file', output_vcf, '--format', 'vcf', '--vcf', '--cache', '--canonical', '--protein', '--sift', 'b', '--polyphen', 'b', '--af_gnomad' ], check=True)
Goal: Quantify the variant allele fraction of specific known mutations across serial liquid biopsy samples for minimal residual disease monitoring.
Approach: For each target mutation, pileup reads at the variant position, count reference and alternative alleles, and compute VAF with depth statistics.
pythondef track_specific_mutations(bam_file, mutations, min_depth=100): ''' Track specific known mutations across samples. Useful for MRD monitoring. Args: bam_file: Aligned BAM mutations: List of (chrom, pos, ref, alt) tuples ''' import pysam bam = pysam.AlignmentFile(bam_file, 'rb') results = [] for chrom, pos, ref, alt in mutations: counts = {'ref': 0, 'alt': 0, 'other': 0} for pileupcolumn in bam.pileup(chrom, pos-1, pos): if pileupcolumn.pos != pos - 1: continue for read in pileupcolumn.pileups: if read.is_del or read.is_refskip: continue base = read.alignment.query_sequence[read.query_position] if base == ref: counts['ref'] += 1 elif base == alt: counts['alt'] += 1 else: counts['other'] += 1 total = counts['ref'] + counts['alt'] + counts['other'] vaf = counts['alt'] / total if total > 0 else 0 results.append({ 'chrom': chrom, 'pos': pos, 'ref': ref, 'alt': alt, 'depth': total, 'alt_count': counts['alt'], 'vaf': vaf }) bam.close() return pd.DataFrame(results)
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +41 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.