Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Detect and remove doublets from flow and mass cytometry data. Covers FSC/SSC gating and computational doublet detection methods. Use when filtering out cell aggregates before clustering or quantitative analysis.
.claude/skills/bio-flow-cytometry-doublet-detection/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: flowCore 2.14+, ggplot2 3.5+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
packageVersion('<pkg>') then ?function_name to verify parametersIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Remove doublets from my flow cytometry data" → Detect and filter out cell aggregates using FSC-A/FSC-H gating or computational methods before clustering or quantitative analysis.
flowCore rectangular gates on FSC-A vs FSC-Hrlibrary(flowCore) library(ggcyto) # Load data fs <- read.flowSet(list.files('data/', pattern = '\\.fcs$', full.names = TRUE)) # FSC-A vs FSC-H for doublet discrimination # Singlets fall on diagonal, doublets have higher FSC-A for given FSC-H # Manual rectangular gate singlet_gate <- rectangleGate( filterId = 'singlets', 'FSC-A' = c(50000, 250000), 'FSC-H' = c(50000, 250000) ) # Or use polygon gate for diagonal singlet_polygon <- polygonGate( filterId = 'singlets', .gate = data.frame( 'FSC-A' = c(50000, 250000, 250000, 50000), 'FSC-H' = c(40000, 200000, 260000, 60000) ) ) # Apply gate singlets <- Subset(fs, singlet_gate) # Visualize autoplot(fs[[1]], 'FSC-A', 'FSC-H') + geom_gate(singlet_gate)
rlibrary(flowDensity) # Automatic singlet gate singlet_result <- flowDensity( fs[[1]], channels = c('FSC-A', 'FSC-H'), position = c(TRUE, TRUE), gates = c(NA, NA) ) # Get gated population singlets <- getflowFrame(singlet_result) # Percentage singlets pct_singlets <- nrow(singlets) / nrow(fs[[1]]) * 100 cat('Singlets:', round(pct_singlets, 1), '%\n')
rlibrary(flowAI) # flowAI performs comprehensive QC including: # - Flow rate anomaly detection # - Signal acquisition anomaly detection # - Dynamic range anomaly detection # Run flowAI fs_qc <- flow_auto_qc( fs, folder_results = 'flowAI_results', fcs_QC = TRUE, fcs_highQ = TRUE ) # Results include singlet detection based on flow rate stability
r# Some instruments provide FSC-W (width) instead of FSC-H # FSC-A = FSC-H × FSC-W # Doublets have higher width if ('FSC-W' %in% colnames(fs[[1]])) { singlet_gate_w <- rectangleGate( filterId = 'singlets', 'FSC-A' = c(50000, 250000), 'FSC-W' = c(50000, 100000) # Lower width = singlets ) singlets <- Subset(fs, singlet_gate_w) }
r# Calculate FSC-A/FSC-H ratio # Singlets have ratio close to constant (based on pulse geometry) # Doublets have elevated ratio calculate_fsc_ratio <- function(ff) { fsc_a <- exprs(ff)[, 'FSC-A'] fsc_h <- exprs(ff)[, 'FSC-H'] ratio <- fsc_a / (fsc_h + 1) # Add small value to avoid division by zero return(ratio) } # Add ratio as derived parameter for (i in 1:length(fs)) { ratio <- calculate_fsc_ratio(fs[[i]]) fs[[i]] <- cbind2(fs[[i]], ratio) colnames(fs[[i]])[ncol(fs[[i]])] <- 'FSC_ratio' } # Gate on ratio ratio_cutoff <- quantile(exprs(fs[[1]])[, 'FSC_ratio'], 0.95) singlet_gate_ratio <- rectangleGate(filterId = 'singlets', 'FSC_ratio' = c(0, ratio_cutoff))
r# For cell types where FSC doesn't discriminate well, # use SSC-A vs SSC-H additionally ssc_singlet_gate <- rectangleGate( filterId = 'ssc_singlets', 'SSC-A' = c(10000, 200000), 'SSC-H' = c(10000, 200000) ) # Combine FSC and SSC gates combined_gate <- singlet_gate & ssc_singlet_gate singlets <- Subset(fs, combined_gate)
rlibrary(CATALYST) # For CyTOF data, use DNA channels or event length # DNA-based doublet detection (if DNA channels present) # Doublets have ~2x DNA content sce <- prepData(fs, panel, md) # If Event_length channel exists if ('Event_length' %in% rownames(sce)) { event_length <- assay(sce)['Event_length', ] singlet_idx <- event_length < quantile(event_length, 0.95) sce_singlets <- sce[, singlet_idx] cat('Removed', sum(!singlet_idx), 'doublets based on event length\n') } # DNA intercalator method if (all(c('DNA1', 'DNA2') %in% rownames(sce))) { dna_total <- assay(sce)['DNA1', ] + assay(sce)['DNA2', ] dna_cutoff <- quantile(dna_total, 0.95) singlet_idx <- dna_total < dna_cutoff sce_singlets <- sce[, singlet_idx] }
Goal: Detect and remove cell doublets from a CyTOF/flow dataset using a regression-based approach on scatter parameters.
Approach: Model the expected FSC-A vs FSC-H relationship for singlets with linear regression, classify events with large residuals (above the 95th percentile) as doublets, and filter them out.
rlibrary(CATALYST) # Load and prepare data sce <- prepData(fs, panel, md, transform = TRUE, cofactor = 5) # Remove doublets using marker-based method sce <- filterSCE(sce, !is_doublet(sce)) # Custom doublet detection based on FSC fsc_a <- colData(sce)$FSC_A fsc_h <- colData(sce)$FSC_H # Model expected singlet relationship fit <- lm(fsc_a ~ fsc_h) residuals <- abs(fsc_a - predict(fit)) threshold <- quantile(residuals, 0.95) # Mark doublets colData(sce)$doublet <- residuals > threshold sce_singlets <- sce[, !colData(sce)$doublet] cat('Doublet rate:', round(mean(colData(sce)$doublet) * 100, 1), '%\n')
r# Process all samples detect_doublets <- function(ff, method = 'fsc') { if (method == 'fsc') { fsc_a <- exprs(ff)[, 'FSC-A'] fsc_h <- exprs(ff)[, 'FSC-H'] fit <- lm(fsc_a ~ fsc_h) residuals <- abs(fsc_a - predict(fit)) threshold <- quantile(residuals, 0.95) singlet_idx <- residuals <= threshold } else if (method == 'ratio') { ratio <- exprs(ff)[, 'FSC-A'] / (exprs(ff)[, 'FSC-H'] + 1) singlet_idx <- ratio < quantile(ratio, 0.95) } return(ff[singlet_idx, ]) } # Apply to all samples fs_singlets <- fsApply(fs, detect_doublets, method = 'fsc') # Report doublet_rates <- sapply(1:length(fs), function(i) { 1 - nrow(fs_singlets[[i]]) / nrow(fs[[i]]) }) cat('Mean doublet rate:', round(mean(doublet_rates) * 100, 1), '%\n')
rlibrary(ggplot2) # Extract data for plotting plot_data <- data.frame( FSC_A = exprs(fs[[1]])[, 'FSC-A'], FSC_H = exprs(fs[[1]])[, 'FSC-H'] ) # Calculate doublet status fit <- lm(FSC_A ~ FSC_H, data = plot_data) plot_data$residual <- abs(plot_data$FSC_A - predict(fit)) plot_data$doublet <- plot_data$residual > quantile(plot_data$residual, 0.95) # Plot ggplot(plot_data, aes(x = FSC_H, y = FSC_A, color = doublet)) + geom_point(alpha = 0.3, size = 0.5) + scale_color_manual(values = c('gray', 'red')) + theme_bw() + labs(title = 'Doublet Detection', x = 'FSC-H', y = 'FSC-A') ggsave('doublet_detection.png', width = 8, height = 6)
Workflow order: cytometry-qc → doublet-detection → bead-normalization → clustering
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +55 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.