Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Predict CRISPR off-target sites using Cas-OFFinder and CFD scoring algorithms. Identify potential unintended cleavage sites genome-wide and assess guide specificity. Use when evaluating guide RNA specificity or selecting guides with minimal off-target risk.
.claude/skills/bio-genome-engineering-off-target-prediction/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: pandas 2.2+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures<tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flagsIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Check my guide RNA for off-target sites" → Search the genome for potential unintended cleavage sites allowing mismatches, then score each off-target by cutting frequency determination (CFD) to assess guide specificity.
cas-offinder for genome-wide off-target searchCas-OFFinder searches genomes for potential off-target sites allowing mismatches.
bash# Input file format (input.txt): # Line 1: Path to genome directory (2bit or fasta index) # Line 2: PAM pattern (N = any, R = A/G, Y = C/T) # Line 3+: Guide sequences with mismatch tolerance # Example input.txt: # /path/to/genome # NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNGG # ATCGATCGATCGATCGATCGNNN 4 # Run Cas-OFFinder cas-offinder input.txt C output.txt # C = use CPU cas-offinder input.txt G output.txt # G = use GPU (faster)
pythondef prepare_cas_offinder_input(guides, genome_path, max_mismatches=4, pam='NGG'): '''Prepare Cas-OFFinder input file Args: guides: List of 20nt guide sequences genome_path: Path to genome directory with .2bit or indexed fasta max_mismatches: Maximum mismatches to search (0-6 typical) More mismatches = slower but more comprehensive 4 mismatches: good balance of speed and sensitivity pam: PAM sequence (NGG for SpCas9) ''' lines = [genome_path] # Build pattern: 20 N's for guide + PAM pattern = 'N' * 20 + pam lines.append(pattern) # Add each guide with mismatch tolerance for guide in guides: # Append NNN to represent PAM positions (not matched) lines.append(f'{guide}NNN {max_mismatches}') return '\n'.join(lines)
pythonimport pandas as pd def parse_cas_offinder_output(output_file): '''Parse Cas-OFFinder results Output columns: - Guide: Query guide sequence - Chromosome: Target chromosome - Position: Genomic position (0-based) - Sequence: Off-target sequence found - Strand: + or - - Mismatches: Number of mismatches ''' columns = ['guide', 'chrom', 'position', 'sequence', 'strand', 'mismatches'] df = pd.read_csv(output_file, sep='\t', header=None, names=columns) # Sort by mismatches (fewer = more concerning) df = df.sort_values('mismatches') return df def summarize_off_targets(df): '''Summarize off-target counts by mismatch number''' summary = df.groupby(['guide', 'mismatches']).size().unstack(fill_value=0) # Calculate specificity score # Fewer off-targets with 0-2 mismatches = higher specificity summary['specificity'] = 1 / (1 + summary.get(0, 0) * 100 + summary.get(1, 0) * 10 + summary.get(2, 0)) return summary
python# Cutting Frequency Determination (CFD) score # Predicts cleavage probability at off-target sites # From Doench et al. 2016 # Position-specific mismatch penalties CFD_MISMATCH_SCORES = { # (position, ref_nt, target_nt): penalty_multiplier # Position 1 = PAM-proximal, Position 20 = PAM-distal # Values < 1 indicate reduced cutting (1, 'C', 'A'): 0.5, (1, 'C', 'G'): 0.7, (1, 'C', 'T'): 0.3, (1, 'G', 'A'): 0.4, (1, 'G', 'C'): 0.6, (1, 'G', 'T'): 0.3, # ... (full matrix has all 20 positions x 12 mismatch types) (20, 'C', 'A'): 0.9, (20, 'C', 'G'): 0.95, (20, 'C', 'T'): 0.85, } # PAM mismatch penalties CFD_PAM_SCORES = { 'AGG': 0.26, 'CGG': 0.11, 'TGG': 0.02, # First position 'GAG': 0.07, 'GCG': 0.03, 'GTG': 0.02, # Second position 'GGA': 0.01, 'GGC': 0.01, 'GGT': 0.01, # Third position } def calculate_cfd_score(guide, off_target, pam='NGG'): '''Calculate CFD score for an off-target site CFD score interpretation: - 1.0: Perfect match (on-target) - >0.5: High probability of cleavage (concerning) - 0.1-0.5: Moderate probability - <0.1: Low probability (likely acceptable) ''' score = 1.0 # Apply mismatch penalties for i, (g, t) in enumerate(zip(guide, off_target[:20]), 1): if g != t: key = (i, g, t) penalty = CFD_MISMATCH_SCORES.get(key, 0.5) # Default 0.5 score *= penalty # Apply PAM penalty if not NGG off_pam = off_target[20:23] if off_pam != 'NGG' and off_pam in CFD_PAM_SCORES: score *= CFD_PAM_SCORES[off_pam] return score
pythondef calculate_guide_specificity(guide, off_targets): '''Calculate aggregate specificity score for a guide Uses sum of CFD scores for all off-targets. Lower aggregate = more specific guide. Specificity score interpretation: - >0.9: Highly specific (excellent) - 0.7-0.9: Specific (good) - 0.5-0.7: Moderate specificity (acceptable) - <0.5: Poor specificity (consider alternatives) ''' cfd_sum = sum(calculate_cfd_score(guide, ot['sequence'], ot.get('pam', 'NGG')) for ot in off_targets) # Specificity = 1 / (1 + sum of off-target CFD scores) specificity = 1 / (1 + cfd_sum) return specificity
Goal: Run a complete off-target analysis pipeline from a single guide sequence to a scored, ranked list of potential off-target sites.
Approach: Prepare a Cas-OFFinder input file, run the genome-wide mismatch search, parse the tabular output, calculate CFD scores for each hit, and flag high-risk off-targets by cleavage probability.
pythondef analyze_guide_specificity(guide_seq, genome_fasta, max_mm=4): '''Full off-target analysis workflow 1. Run Cas-OFFinder to find potential sites 2. Calculate CFD scores for each site 3. Compute aggregate specificity 4. Flag high-risk off-targets ''' import subprocess import tempfile # Prepare input with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(mode='w', suffix='.txt', delete=False) as f: f.write(f'{genome_fasta}\n') f.write('N' * 20 + 'NGG\n') f.write(f'{guide_seq}NNN {max_mm}\n') input_file = f.name output_file = input_file.replace('.txt', '_out.txt') # Run Cas-OFFinder subprocess.run(['cas-offinder', input_file, 'C', output_file], check=True) # Parse results off_targets = parse_cas_offinder_output(output_file) # Calculate CFD for each off_targets['cfd_score'] = off_targets.apply( lambda row: calculate_cfd_score(guide_seq, row['sequence']), axis=1 ) # Flag high-risk (CFD > 0.5 and in exon) # Would need exon annotations for full implementation return off_targets
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.