Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Detect and remove doublets (multiple cells captured in one droplet) from single-cell RNA-seq data. Uses Scrublet (Python), DoubletFinder (R), and scDblFinder (R). Essential QC step before clustering to avoid artificial cell populations. Use when identifying and removing doublets from scRNA-seq data.
.claude/skills/bio-single-cell-doublet-detection/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: matplotlib 3.8+, numpy 1.26+, scanpy 1.10+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signaturespackageVersion('<pkg>') then ?function_name to verify parametersIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
Doublets are droplets containing two or more cells. They appear as artificial intermediate cell populations and must be removed before analysis.
Goal: Detect and score doublets in scRNA-seq data using simulated doublet profiles.
Approach: Simulate artificial doublets by combining random cell pairs, embed real and simulated cells together, and score each cell's similarity to simulated doublets.
"Remove doublets from my data" → Identify droplets containing multiple cells by comparing each cell's profile to computationally simulated doublets, then filter flagged cells.
pythonimport scrublet as scr import scanpy as sc import numpy as np adata = sc.read_10x_mtx('filtered_feature_bc_matrix/') scrub = scr.Scrublet(adata.X, expected_doublet_rate=0.06) doublet_scores, predicted_doublets = scrub.scrub_doublets() adata.obs['doublet_score'] = doublet_scores adata.obs['predicted_doublet'] = predicted_doublets print(f'Detected {predicted_doublets.sum()} doublets ({100*predicted_doublets.mean():.1f}%)')
pythonscrub = scr.Scrublet(adata.X, expected_doublet_rate=0.06) doublet_scores, predicted_doublets = scrub.scrub_doublets( min_counts=2, min_cells=3, min_gene_variability_pctl=85, n_prin_comps=30, synthetic_doublet_umi_subsampling=1.0 )
pythonimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt scrub.plot_histogram() plt.savefig('doublet_histogram.pdf') # UMAP with doublet scores sc.pp.normalize_total(adata, target_sum=1e4) sc.pp.log1p(adata) sc.pp.highly_variable_genes(adata) sc.pp.pca(adata) sc.pp.neighbors(adata) sc.tl.umap(adata) sc.pl.umap(adata, color=['doublet_score', 'predicted_doublet'], save='_doublets.pdf')
pythonadata_filtered = adata[~adata.obs['predicted_doublet']].copy() print(f'Kept {adata_filtered.n_obs} cells after doublet removal')
pythonscrub = scr.Scrublet(adata.X) doublet_scores, _ = scrub.scrub_doublets() threshold = 0.25 predicted_doublets = doublet_scores > threshold adata.obs['predicted_doublet'] = predicted_doublets
Goal: Detect doublets in Seurat objects using DoubletFinder's pANN-based classification.
Approach: Optimize the pK neighborhood parameter via parameter sweep, compute artificial nearest neighbor proportions, and classify cells as singlets or doublets.
rlibrary(Seurat) library(DoubletFinder) seurat_obj <- Read10X(data.dir = 'filtered_feature_bc_matrix/') seurat_obj <- CreateSeuratObject(counts = seurat_obj, min.cells = 3, min.features = 200) seurat_obj <- NormalizeData(seurat_obj) seurat_obj <- FindVariableFeatures(seurat_obj) seurat_obj <- ScaleData(seurat_obj) seurat_obj <- RunPCA(seurat_obj) seurat_obj <- RunUMAP(seurat_obj, dims = 1:20) seurat_obj <- FindNeighbors(seurat_obj, dims = 1:20) seurat_obj <- FindClusters(seurat_obj, resolution = 0.5) sweep.res <- paramSweep(seurat_obj, PCs = 1:20, sct = FALSE) sweep.stats <- summarizeSweep(sweep.res, GT = FALSE) bcmvn <- find.pK(sweep.stats) optimal_pk <- as.numeric(as.character(bcmvn$pK[which.max(bcmvn$BCmetric)])) nExp_poi <- round(0.06 * nrow(seurat_obj@meta.data)) seurat_obj <- doubletFinder(seurat_obj, PCs = 1:20, pN = 0.25, pK = optimal_pk, nExp = nExp_poi, reuse.pANN = FALSE, sct = FALSE) colnames(seurat_obj@meta.data)
rseurat_obj <- SCTransform(seurat_obj) seurat_obj <- RunPCA(seurat_obj) seurat_obj <- RunUMAP(seurat_obj, dims = 1:30) seurat_obj <- FindNeighbors(seurat_obj, dims = 1:30) seurat_obj <- FindClusters(seurat_obj, resolution = 0.5) sweep.res <- paramSweep(seurat_obj, PCs = 1:30, sct = TRUE) sweep.stats <- summarizeSweep(sweep.res, GT = FALSE) bcmvn <- find.pK(sweep.stats) optimal_pk <- as.numeric(as.character(bcmvn$pK[which.max(bcmvn$BCmetric)])) nExp_poi <- round(0.06 * nrow(seurat_obj@meta.data)) seurat_obj <- doubletFinder(seurat_obj, PCs = 1:30, pN = 0.25, pK = optimal_pk, nExp = nExp_poi, reuse.pANN = FALSE, sct = TRUE)
rdf_col <- grep('DF.classifications', colnames(seurat_obj@meta.data), value = TRUE) seurat_obj$doublet <- seurat_obj@meta.data[[df_col]] DimPlot(seurat_obj, group.by = 'doublet') seurat_obj <- subset(seurat_obj, subset = doublet == 'Singlet')
rn_cells <- ncol(seurat_obj) doublet_rate <- n_cells / 1000 * 0.008 nExp_poi <- round(doublet_rate * n_cells)
Goal: Detect doublets using scDblFinder's gradient-boosted classifier for fast, accurate identification.
Approach: Simulate doublets, train a gradient boosting classifier on real vs simulated profiles, and score each cell.
rlibrary(scDblFinder) library(SingleCellExperiment) sce <- SingleCellExperiment(assays = list(counts = counts_matrix)) sce <- scDblFinder(sce) table(sce$scDblFinder.class)
rlibrary(scDblFinder) library(Seurat) sce <- as.SingleCellExperiment(seurat_obj) sce <- scDblFinder(sce) seurat_obj$scDblFinder_class <- sce$scDblFinder.class seurat_obj$scDblFinder_score <- sce$scDblFinder.score DimPlot(seurat_obj, group.by = 'scDblFinder_class') seurat_obj <- subset(seurat_obj, subset = scDblFinder_class == 'singlet')
rsce <- scDblFinder(sce, samples = 'sample_id')
rsce <- scDblFinder(sce, dbr = 0.06, dbr.sd = 0.015, nfeatures = 1500, dims = 20, k = 30 )
| Cells Loaded | Expected Rate | |--------------|---------------| | 1,000 | ~0.8% | | 2,000 | ~1.6% | | 5,000 | ~4.0% | | 10,000 | ~8.0% | | 15,000 | ~12% |
Formula: rate ≈ cells_loaded / 1000 * 0.008
rlibrary(scDblFinder) seurat_obj$scrublet <- scrublet_results sce <- as.SingleCellExperiment(seurat_obj) sce <- scDblFinder(sce) seurat_obj$scDblFinder <- sce$scDblFinder.class DimPlot(seurat_obj, group.by = c('doublet', 'scDblFinder', 'scrublet'), ncol = 3) table(seurat_obj$doublet, seurat_obj$scDblFinder)
pythonadata.obs['log_counts'] = np.log1p(adata.obs['total_counts']) sc.pl.violin(adata, 'log_counts', groupby='predicted_doublet')
Goal: Run doublet detection as part of a complete Scanpy preprocessing workflow.
Approach: Detect and remove doublets with Scrublet before QC filtering, then proceed through normalization, HVG selection, and clustering.
pythonimport scanpy as sc import scrublet as scr adata = sc.read_10x_mtx('filtered_feature_bc_matrix/') adata.var['mt'] = adata.var_names.str.startswith('MT-') sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics(adata, qc_vars=['mt'], inplace=True) scrub = scr.Scrublet(adata.X, expected_doublet_rate=0.06) doublet_scores, predicted_doublets = scrub.scrub_doublets() adata.obs['doublet_score'] = doublet_scores adata.obs['is_doublet'] = predicted_doublets print(f'Before filtering: {adata.n_obs} cells') adata = adata[~adata.obs['is_doublet']].copy() adata = adata[adata.obs['pct_counts_mt'] < 20].copy() print(f'After filtering: {adata.n_obs} cells') sc.pp.normalize_total(adata, target_sum=1e4) sc.pp.log1p(adata) sc.pp.highly_variable_genes(adata) sc.pp.pca(adata) sc.pp.neighbors(adata) sc.tl.umap(adata) sc.tl.leiden(adata)
Goal: Run DoubletFinder as part of a complete Seurat preprocessing workflow.
Approach: Preprocess and cluster, run DoubletFinder parameter sweep and classification, filter doublets, then re-preprocess clean singlets.
rlibrary(Seurat) library(DoubletFinder) seurat_obj <- Read10X('filtered_feature_bc_matrix/') seurat_obj <- CreateSeuratObject(counts = seurat_obj, min.cells = 3, min.features = 200) seurat_obj[['percent.mt']] <- PercentageFeatureSet(seurat_obj, pattern = '^MT-') seurat_obj <- NormalizeData(seurat_obj) seurat_obj <- FindVariableFeatures(seurat_obj) seurat_obj <- ScaleData(seurat_obj) seurat_obj <- RunPCA(seurat_obj) seurat_obj <- RunUMAP(seurat_obj, dims = 1:20) seurat_obj <- FindNeighbors(seurat_obj, dims = 1:20) seurat_obj <- FindClusters(seurat_obj, resolution = 0.5) sweep.res <- paramSweep(seurat_obj, PCs = 1:20) sweep.stats <- summarizeSweep(sweep.res) bcmvn <- find.pK(sweep.stats) pk <- as.numeric(as.character(bcmvn$pK[which.max(bcmvn$BCmetric)])) nExp <- round(0.06 * ncol(seurat_obj)) seurat_obj <- doubletFinder(seurat_obj, PCs = 1:20, pN = 0.25, pK = pk, nExp = nExp) df_col <- grep('DF.classifications', colnames(seurat_obj@meta.data), value = TRUE) seurat_obj <- subset(seurat_obj, cells = colnames(seurat_obj)[seurat_obj@meta.data[[df_col]] == 'Singlet']) seurat_obj <- subset(seurat_obj, subset = percent.mt < 20) seurat_obj <- NormalizeData(seurat_obj) seurat_obj <- FindVariableFeatures(seurat_obj) seurat_obj <- ScaleData(seurat_obj) seurat_obj <- RunPCA(seurat_obj) seurat_obj <- RunUMAP(seurat_obj, dims = 1:20) seurat_obj <- FindNeighbors(seurat_obj, dims = 1:20) seurat_obj <- FindClusters(seurat_obj)
| Method | Speed | Accuracy | Language | |--------|-------|----------|----------| | Scrublet | Fast | Good | Python | | DoubletFinder | Slow | Good | R | | scDblFinder | Fast | Excellent | R |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +27 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.