Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Predict protein structures using modern ML models including AlphaFold3, ESMFold, Chai-1, and Boltz-1. Use when predicting structures for novel proteins, protein complexes, or when comparing predictions across multiple methods.
.claude/skills/bio-structural-biology-modern-structure-prediction/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: BioPython 1.83+, numpy 1.26+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures<tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flagsIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Predict the structure of my protein" → Run ML-based structure prediction using ESMFold (single-sequence, fast), AlphaFold3 (MSA-based, highest accuracy), Chai-1, or Boltz-1 and compare predictions across methods.
requests, local ESMFold with esm.pretrainedPredict protein structures using state-of-the-art machine learning models. This covers cloud APIs, local installations, and interpretation of results.
| Model | Complexes | Ligands | Speed | Access | |-------|-----------|---------|-------|--------| | AlphaFold3 | Yes | Yes | Slow | Server only (2025) | | ESMFold | No | No | Fast | API or local | | Chai-1 | Yes | Yes | Moderate | Local or API | | Boltz-1 | Yes | Yes | Moderate | Local | | ColabFold | No | No | Moderate | Colab/local |
ColabFold can predict complexes with AlphaFold-Multimer.
Goal: Predict a protein's 3D structure from its amino acid sequence using the ESMFold language model, which requires no MSA and runs in seconds.
Approach: Submit the sequence to the ESMFold API (or run locally with the esm library), retrieve the predicted PDB coordinates, and assess per-residue confidence via pLDDT scores in the B-factor column.
pythonimport requests def predict_esmfold(sequence): '''Predict structure using ESMFold API''' url = 'https://api.esmatlas.com/foldSequence/v1/pdb/' response = requests.post(url, data=sequence, timeout=300) if response.status_code == 200: return response.text raise Exception(f'ESMFold failed: {response.status_code}') sequence = 'MVLSPADKTNVKAAWGKVGAHAGEYGAEALERMFLSFPTTKTYFPHFDLSH' pdb_text = predict_esmfold(sequence) with open('predicted.pdb', 'w') as f: f.write(pdb_text)
pythonimport torch import esm def predict_esmfold_local(sequence, device='cuda'): '''Run ESMFold locally (requires ~16GB GPU memory)''' model = esm.pretrained.esmfold_v1() model = model.eval().to(device) with torch.no_grad(): output = model.infer_pdb(sequence) return output # Extract pLDDT from ESMFold output def extract_esmfold_plddt(pdb_text): plddt = {} for line in pdb_text.split('\n'): if line.startswith('ATOM') and line[12:16].strip() == 'CA': resnum = int(line[22:26]) bfactor = float(line[60:66]) plddt[resnum] = bfactor return plddt
AlphaFold3 predictions via the server at alphafoldserver.com.
pythonimport json def create_af3_input(sequences, job_name='prediction'): '''Create AlphaFold3 server input JSON''' entities = [] for i, seq in enumerate(sequences): entities.append({ 'type': 'protein', 'sequence': seq, 'count': 1 }) job = { 'name': job_name, 'modelSeeds': [1], 'sequences': entities } return json.dumps(job, indent=2) # Single protein input_json = create_af3_input(['MVLSPADKTNVKAAWGKVGAHAGEYGAEALERMFLSFPTTKTYFPHFDLSH']) # Protein complex input_json = create_af3_input([ 'MVLSPADKTNVKAAWGKVGAHAGEYGAEALERMFLSFPTTKTYFPHFDLSH', 'MGHFTEEDKATITSLWGKVNVEDAGGETLGRLLVVYPWTQRFFDSFGNLSS' ])
pythonimport json from Bio.PDB import PDBParser import numpy as np def analyze_af3_result(result_dir): '''Analyze AlphaFold3 prediction results''' # Load summary with open(f'{result_dir}/summary_confidences.json') as f: summary = json.load(f) # Extract confidence metrics iptm = summary.get('iptm', None) # Interface pTM (complexes) ptm = summary.get('ptm', None) # Predicted TM-score ranking = summary.get('ranking_score', None) print(f'pTM: {ptm:.3f}' if ptm else 'pTM: N/A') print(f'ipTM: {iptm:.3f}' if iptm else 'ipTM: N/A') return summary
| Metric | Range | Interpretation | |--------|-------|----------------| | pTM | 0-1 | Overall structure confidence | | ipTM | 0-1 | Interface prediction quality | | pLDDT | 0-100 | Per-residue confidence | | PAE | 0-30A | Position error between residue pairs |
bashpip install chai-lab
pythonfrom chai_lab.chai1 import run_inference import numpy as np from pathlib import Path def predict_chai1(fasta_path, output_dir='chai_output'): '''Run Chai-1 structure prediction''' Path(output_dir).mkdir(exist_ok=True) candidates = run_inference( fasta_file=Path(fasta_path), output_dir=Path(output_dir), num_trunk_recycles=3, # 3: Standard. Use 5+ for difficult targets. num_diffn_timesteps=200, # 200: Standard. 500 for higher quality. seed=42, device='cuda:0' ) return candidates # Candidates are sorted by confidence # candidates.cif files contain predicted structures
python# Chai-1 supports protein-ligand complexes # Include ligand SMILES in input FASTA with special format def create_chai_fasta_with_ligand(protein_seq, ligand_smiles, output_file): '''Create Chai-1 input with protein and ligand''' with open(output_file, 'w') as f: f.write('>protein|chain_A\n') f.write(f'{protein_seq}\n') f.write('>ligand|chain_B\n') f.write(f'{ligand_smiles}\n')
bashpip install boltz
pythonfrom boltz import Boltz1 def predict_boltz1(sequences, output_dir='boltz_output'): '''Run Boltz-1 structure prediction''' model = Boltz1() result = model.predict( sequences=sequences, output_dir=output_dir, recycling_steps=3, # 3: Standard. Increase for difficult targets. sampling_steps=200 # 200: Standard. 500 for publication quality. ) return result
python# Boltz-1 handles heteromeric complexes def predict_complex_boltz(chain_sequences): '''Predict protein complex with Boltz-1''' model = Boltz1() result = model.predict( sequences=chain_sequences, # List of sequences for each chain output_dir='complex_output' ) # Extract interface metrics return result
bash# Install ColabFold pip install colabfold # Run prediction colabfold_batch input.fasta output_dir/ # With custom templates colabfold_batch input.fasta output_dir/ --templates # For complexes (use : to separate chains) # Create FASTA like: >complex\nSEQUENCE1:SEQUENCE2
pythonfrom colabfold.batch import run_colabfold def predict_colabfold(fasta_file, output_dir, use_templates=False): '''Run ColabFold prediction''' run_colabfold( input_path=fasta_file, result_dir=output_dir, use_templates=use_templates, num_models=5, # 5: Standard. Use 1 for quick predictions. num_recycles=3, # 3: Standard. Increase for multimers. model_order=[1,2,3,4,5] )
pythonfrom Bio.PDB import PDBParser, Superimposer import numpy as np def compare_predictions(pdb_files, labels=None): '''Compare multiple structure predictions''' parser = PDBParser(QUIET=True) structures = [parser.get_structure(f'model_{i}', f) for i, f in enumerate(pdb_files)] # Extract CA atoms from first chain def get_ca_atoms(struct): return [r['CA'] for r in struct[0].get_residues() if 'CA' in r] all_atoms = [get_ca_atoms(s) for s in structures] # Pairwise RMSD n = len(structures) rmsd_matrix = np.zeros((n, n)) for i in range(n): for j in range(i+1, n): min_len = min(len(all_atoms[i]), len(all_atoms[j])) super_imposer = Superimposer() super_imposer.set_atoms(all_atoms[i][:min_len], all_atoms[j][:min_len]) rmsd_matrix[i,j] = rmsd_matrix[j,i] = super_imposer.rms return rmsd_matrix # Compare ESMFold vs AlphaFold3 vs Chai-1 rmsd = compare_predictions(['esmfold.pdb', 'af3.pdb', 'chai1.pdb']) print('RMSD matrix:') print(rmsd)
| Scenario | Recommended Model | |----------|-------------------| | Quick single-chain prediction | ESMFold (API) | | Highest accuracy single chain | AlphaFold3 or ColabFold | | Protein-protein complex | AlphaFold3, Chai-1, or Boltz-1 | | Protein-ligand complex | AlphaFold3 or Chai-1 | | No GPU available | ESMFold API or AlphaFold3 server | | Large-scale screening | ESMFold (local) | | Open-source requirement | Chai-1 or Boltz-1 |
| Model | GPU Memory | Notes | |-------|------------|-------| | ESMFold | ~16 GB | Sequence length dependent | | ColabFold | ~8-16 GB | Model size dependent | | Chai-1 | ~24 GB | Complex size dependent | | Boltz-1 | ~24 GB | Complex size dependent |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +27 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.