Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Clinical variant interpretation using ClinVar, ACMG guidelines, and pathogenicity predictors. Prioritize variants for diagnostic and research applications. Use when interpreting clinical significance of variants.
.claude/skills/bio-variant-calling-clinical-interpretation/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: Entrez Direct 21.0+, bcftools 1.19+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures<tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flagsIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
Prioritize and interpret variants for clinical significance using databases and ACMG/AMP guidelines.
Annotated VCF
│
├── Database Lookup
│ ├── ClinVar (clinical assertions)
│ ├── OMIM (disease associations)
│ └── gnomAD (population frequency)
│
├── Computational Predictions
│ ├── SIFT, PolyPhen-2
│ ├── CADD, REVEL
│ └── SpliceAI
│
├── ACMG Classification
│ └── Pathogenic → Likely Pathogenic → VUS → Likely Benign → Benign
│
└── Prioritized Variant ListGoal: Annotate variants with ClinVar clinical significance and filter by pathogenicity.
Approach: Download the ClinVar VCF, add CLNSIG/CLNDN/CLNREVSTAT fields with bcftools annotate, then filter by significance level.
"Find pathogenic variants in my VCF" → Cross-reference variants against ClinVar clinical assertions and extract those classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic.
bashwget https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/clinvar/vcf_GRCh38/clinvar.vcf.gz wget https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/clinvar/vcf_GRCh38/clinvar.vcf.gz.tbi
bashbcftools annotate \ -a clinvar.vcf.gz \ -c INFO/CLNSIG,INFO/CLNDN,INFO/CLNREVSTAT \ input.vcf.gz -Oz -o with_clinvar.vcf.gz
bash# Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic bcftools view -i 'INFO/CLNSIG~"Pathogenic" || INFO/CLNSIG~"Likely_pathogenic"' \ with_clinvar.vcf.gz -Oz -o pathogenic.vcf.gz # Exclude benign bcftools view -e 'INFO/CLNSIG~"Benign" || INFO/CLNSIG~"Likely_benign"' \ with_clinvar.vcf.gz -Oz -o not_benign.vcf.gz
| CLNSIG | Meaning | Action | |--------|---------|--------| | Pathogenic | Disease-causing | Report | | Likely_pathogenic | Probably disease-causing | Report with caveat | | Uncertain_significance | VUS | May report, needs follow-up | | Likely_benign | Probably not disease-causing | Usually exclude | | Benign | Not disease-causing | Exclude | | Conflicting | Multiple interpretations | Manual review |
| CLNREVSTAT | Stars | Meaning | |------------|-------|---------| | practice_guideline | 4 | Expert panel reviewed | | reviewed_by_expert_panel | 3 | ClinGen expert reviewed | | criteria_provided,_multiple_submitters | 2 | Consistent assertions | | criteria_provided,_single_submitter | 1 | One submitter with criteria | | no_assertion_criteria | 0 | No criteria provided |
bash# Filter for high-confidence assertions (2+ stars) bcftools view -i 'INFO/CLNREVSTAT~"multiple_submitters" || \ INFO/CLNREVSTAT~"expert_panel" || \ INFO/CLNREVSTAT~"practice_guideline"' \ with_clinvar.vcf.gz -Oz -o high_confidence.vcf.gz
Goal: Classify variants according to ACMG/AMP guidelines using automated criteria evaluation.
Approach: Convert VCF to ANNOVAR format, run InterVar to evaluate 28 ACMG criteria, and output five-tier classification.
Automated ACMG/AMP variant classification.
bashgit clone https://github.com/WGLab/InterVar.git cd InterVar # Download databases per documentation
bashpython Intervar.py \ -i input.avinput \ -o output \ -b hg38 \ -d humandb/ \ --input_type=AVinput
bash# Convert VCF to ANNOVAR format convert2annovar.pl -format vcf4 input.vcf > input.avinput # Run InterVar python Intervar.py -i input.avinput -o intervar_results -b hg38
| Code | Type | Description | |------|------|-------------| | PVS1 | Very Strong | Null variant in gene where LOF is disease mechanism | | PS1-4 | Strong | Same AA change, functional studies, etc. | | PM1-6 | Moderate | Hot spot, absent from controls, etc. | | PP1-5 | Supporting | Co-segregation, computational evidence |
| Code | Type | Description | |------|------|-------------| | BA1 | Stand-alone | AF >5% in gnomAD | | BS1-4 | Strong | AF greater than expected, functional studies | | BP1-7 | Supporting | Missense in gene with truncating mechanism |
Goal: Restrict to rare variants that could be disease-causing.
Approach: Filter by gnomAD allele frequency threshold appropriate for the disease model (dominant vs. recessive).
bash# Rare variants only (gnomAD AF < 0.01) bcftools view -i 'INFO/gnomAD_AF<0.01 || INFO/gnomAD_AF="."' \ input.vcf.gz -Oz -o rare.vcf.gz # Ultra-rare for dominant diseases (AF < 0.0001) bcftools view -i 'INFO/gnomAD_AF<0.0001 || INFO/gnomAD_AF="."' \ input.vcf.gz -Oz -o ultrarare.vcf.gz
Goal: Prioritize variants using computational pathogenicity predictors.
Approach: Filter by CADD PHRED score (deleteriousness) and REVEL score (missense pathogenicity), alone or in combination with ClinVar.
bash# CADD > 20 (top 1% deleterious) bcftools view -i 'INFO/CADD_PHRED>20' input.vcf.gz -Oz -o cadd_filtered.vcf.gz # CADD > 30 (top 0.1%) bcftools view -i 'INFO/CADD_PHRED>30' input.vcf.gz -Oz -o highly_deleterious.vcf.gz
bash# REVEL > 0.5 (likely pathogenic) bcftools view -i 'INFO/REVEL>0.5' input.vcf.gz -Oz -o revel_filtered.vcf.gz
bashbcftools view -i '(INFO/CADD_PHRED>20 || INFO/REVEL>0.5) && \ (INFO/CLNSIG~"Pathogenic" || INFO/CLNSIG~"Likely" || INFO/CLNSIG=".")' \ input.vcf.gz -Oz -o prioritized.vcf.gz
Goal: Implement a multi-criteria variant classification pipeline in Python.
Approach: Combine ClinVar lookups, population frequency, and computational scores (CADD, REVEL) into a tiered classification function.
pythonfrom cyvcf2 import VCF, Writer def classify_variant(variant): clnsig = variant.INFO.get('CLNSIG', '') af = variant.INFO.get('gnomAD_AF', 0) or 0 cadd = variant.INFO.get('CADD_PHRED', 0) or 0 revel = variant.INFO.get('REVEL', 0) or 0 # Known pathogenic if 'Pathogenic' in str(clnsig): return 'PATHOGENIC' if 'Likely_pathogenic' in str(clnsig): return 'LIKELY_PATHOGENIC' # Known benign if 'Benign' in str(clnsig) or af > 0.05: return 'BENIGN' # Computational prediction if cadd > 25 or revel > 0.7: if af < 0.0001: return 'LIKELY_PATHOGENIC' elif af < 0.01: return 'VUS_FAVOR_PATH' if cadd < 10 and revel < 0.3: return 'LIKELY_BENIGN' return 'VUS' vcf = VCF('annotated.vcf.gz') results = [] for variant in vcf: classification = classify_variant(variant) if classification in ('PATHOGENIC', 'LIKELY_PATHOGENIC', 'VUS_FAVOR_PATH'): gene = variant.INFO.get('SYMBOL', 'Unknown') consequence = variant.INFO.get('Consequence', 'Unknown') results.append({ 'chrom': variant.CHROM, 'pos': variant.POS, 'ref': variant.REF, 'alt': variant.ALT[0], 'gene': gene, 'consequence': consequence, 'classification': classification, 'clnsig': variant.INFO.get('CLNSIG', '.'), 'cadd': variant.INFO.get('CADD_PHRED', '.'), 'af': variant.INFO.get('gnomAD_AF', '.') }) # Output prioritized variants for r in results: print(f"{r['gene']}\t{r['chrom']}:{r['pos']}\t{r['consequence']}\t{r['classification']}")
Goal: Restrict analysis to variants within a clinical gene panel.
Approach: Filter by BED coordinates or VEP gene symbol annotations to target specific genes.
bash# Filter to gene panel bcftools view -R gene_panel.bed input.vcf.gz -Oz -o panel_variants.vcf.gz # Or by gene symbol (requires VEP annotation) bcftools view -i 'INFO/CSQ~"BRCA1" || INFO/CSQ~"BRCA2"' \ input.vcf.gz -Oz -o brca_variants.vcf.gz
| Resource | Content | Use | |----------|---------|-----| | ClinVar | Clinical assertions | Primary lookup | | OMIM | Gene-disease relationships | Gene prioritization | | HGMD | Published mutations | Literature evidence | | gnomAD | Population frequencies | Rarity filtering | | ClinGen | Gene validity/dosage | LOF interpretation |
bashbcftools query -f '%CHROM\t%POS\t%REF\t%ALT\t%INFO/SYMBOL\t%INFO/Consequence\t\ %INFO/CLNSIG\t%INFO/CLNDN\t%INFO/gnomAD_AF\t%INFO/CADD_PHRED\n' \ prioritized.vcf.gz > clinical_report.tsv
Goal: Run an end-to-end clinical variant interpretation pipeline from annotation through reporting.
Approach: Chain ClinVar annotation, rare variant filtering, pathogenicity extraction, VUS review, and TSV report generation.
bash#!/bin/bash set -euo pipefail INPUT=$1 CLINVAR=$2 OUTPUT_PREFIX=$3 echo "=== Add ClinVar annotations ===" bcftools annotate -a $CLINVAR \ -c INFO/CLNSIG,INFO/CLNDN,INFO/CLNREVSTAT,INFO/CLNVC \ $INPUT -Oz -o ${OUTPUT_PREFIX}_clinvar.vcf.gz echo "=== Filter rare variants ===" bcftools view -i 'INFO/gnomAD_AF<0.01 || INFO/gnomAD_AF="."' \ ${OUTPUT_PREFIX}_clinvar.vcf.gz -Oz -o ${OUTPUT_PREFIX}_rare.vcf.gz echo "=== Extract pathogenic/likely pathogenic ===" bcftools view -i 'INFO/CLNSIG~"athogenic"' \ ${OUTPUT_PREFIX}_rare.vcf.gz -Oz -o ${OUTPUT_PREFIX}_pathogenic.vcf.gz echo "=== Extract high-impact VUS ===" bcftools view -i 'INFO/CLNSIG~"Uncertain" && INFO/CADD_PHRED>20' \ ${OUTPUT_PREFIX}_rare.vcf.gz -Oz -o ${OUTPUT_PREFIX}_vus_review.vcf.gz echo "=== Generate report ===" bcftools query -H -f '%CHROM\t%POS\t%REF\t%ALT\t%INFO/SYMBOL\t%INFO/Consequence\t\ %INFO/CLNSIG\t%INFO/CLNDN\t%INFO/gnomAD_AF\t%INFO/CADD_PHRED\n' \ ${OUTPUT_PREFIX}_pathogenic.vcf.gz > ${OUTPUT_PREFIX}_report.tsv echo "=== Complete ===" echo "Pathogenic: ${OUTPUT_PREFIX}_pathogenic.vcf.gz" echo "VUS for review: ${OUTPUT_PREFIX}_vus_review.vcf.gz" echo "Report: ${OUTPUT_PREFIX}_report.tsv"
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 20 counted toward the lift figure. The other 2 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +14 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 20 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.