Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →bluelovers/openspec-apply-change
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
Passed 12 of 17 test cases with the skill, and 6 of 17 without it.
and 6 more in the full report
8 fixed7 passed either way6 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
This benchmark measured an earlier version of the skill.
A newer attempt on gemini-3.6-flash on 10/2/2026 did not produce a publishable comparison (not comparable). The snapshot above is the previously measured run.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Before processing implementation tasks for the change `update-api-v2`, we need to check its active workflow schema and planning constraints. What exact CLI command should be executed to retrieve this information in JSON format?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| openspec status --change "update-api-v2" --json | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Project check: These steps expect a project that already uses OpenSpec. Before the first step that writes anything (new change, archive, sync specs, or authoring an artifact file), confirm the project has a root: run openspec list --json (with --store <id> when a store is selected, since the store is then the root) and read root. A root object means the project is set up. "root": null means it is not - there is no openspec/ directory here, and a write such as openspec new change would create one as a side effect. The command also exits non-zero, which is that answer rather than a broken CLI, so read the JSON instead of retrying or working around it.
One "root": null is not about setup: when a status error message starts with Declared in or Invalid store declaration in and names this project's openspec/config.yaml (or config.yml), the project does use OpenSpec through a store it declares, which this machine cannot resolve (the store is not registered, or the store: line is malformed). Do not treat it as uninitialized and skip the branches below: stop before writing and show the user that error's message and fix.
Otherwise, with no root, what happens next depends on how this workflow was reached:
openspec init), target a store they already have (--store <id>), or continue without OpenSpec for this request. Wait for their answer.In both branches, never create the root as a side effect: do not run openspec init until the user asks for it, do not hand-create openspec/ files, and do not let a command create it.
Input: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., /opsx-apply add-auth). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
openspec list --json to get available changes and ask the user to select oneAlways announce: "Using change: " and how to override (e.g., /opsx-apply <other>).
Check status to understand the schema
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
Parse the JSON to understand:
schemaName: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")planningHome, changeRoot, and actionContext: planning scope and edit constraintsGet apply instructions
test cases passed, vs 6 / 17 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.