Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Design AI agent communication protocols: MCP tool schemas, A2A, function calling, and inter- agent messaging. Use when building multi-agent systems, defining tool interfaces, or implementing agent-to-agent communication.
.claude/skills/borghei-agent-protocol/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 451% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 57% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 73% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 67% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 55% | 0% |
The agent designs tool schemas for MCP, Google A2A, and OpenAI Function Calling protocols. It implements transport selection, capability discovery, authentication flows (OAuth 2.1, API keys), structured error handling, rate limiting, and protocol bridges for heterogeneous agent ecosystems.
Before designing the protocol, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
What are you building?
│
├─ Tools for a single LLM client (Claude, Cursor, Copilot)
│ └─ Use MCP — it's the native protocol for tool serving
│
├─ Agent-to-agent communication across organizations
│ └─ Use A2A — designed for cross-boundary agent discovery and delegation
│
├─ Tools for OpenAI models specifically
│ └─ Use OpenAI Function Calling — tightest integration
│
├─ Python pipeline with multiple chained tools
│ └─ Use LangChain Tools — simplest for in-process orchestration
│
└─ Heterogeneous agent ecosystem (multiple protocols)
└─ Use Protocol Bridge pattern — translate between protocols at boundariesLoad the reference that matches the task — keep this file lean and pull detail on demand:
This skill covers:
This skill does NOT cover:
engineering/mcp-server-builderengineering/agent-workflow-designerengineering/agent-designerengineering/senior-devops| Skill | Integration | Data Flow | |-------|-------------|-----------| | engineering/mcp-server-builder | Protocol schemas defined here feed directly into MCP server scaffolding | Tool definitions and inputSchema objects flow into server code generation | | engineering/agent-workflow-designer | Workflow orchestrators consume protocol interfaces to dispatch tasks | Agent-protocol defines the transport contract; workflow-designer defines execution order and branching | | engineering/agent-designer | Agent identity and capability profiles reference protocol-level skill declarations | Agent cards and capability metadata from protocol design inform agent persona configuration | | engineering/senior-security | Security review of auth flows, token scoping, and rate limiting configurations | OAuth 2.1 flows, API key rotation policies, and audit logging patterns flow into security assessments | | engineering/api-design-reviewer | REST and JSON-RPC endpoint design review for A2A and MCP HTTP transports | API schema and endpoint contracts feed into design review checklists | | engineering/observability-designer | Monitoring and tracing for inter-agent calls, latency tracking, and error budgets | Tool call logs with agent ID, latency, and error codes flow into observability dashboards |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-03 | fail→fail | 62,830 | 30,708 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,197 | 7,523 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 23,900 | 29,390 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,751 | 7,520 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 22,205 | 25,141 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,169 | 5,951 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 3,495 | 8,454 | +142% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 552 | 3,040 | +451% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 17,087 | 17,106 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,970 | 4,654 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 10,444 | 15,922 | +52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,117 | 4,504 | +113% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 15,266 | 15,477 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,506 | 4,334 | +73% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 4,485 | 9,829 | +119% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 848 | 3,093 | +265% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 25,420 | 16,913 | -33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,988 | 4,319 | +117% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 17,668 | 20,665 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,478 | 5,811 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 14,121 | 17,141 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,608 | 4,393 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 15,770 | 23,526 | +49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,633 | 5,914 | +125% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 19,829 | 21,215 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,471 | 5,560 | +60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 12,103 | 17,615 | +46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,946 | 4,396 | +126% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 9,168 | 13,246 | +44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,520 | 3,898 | +156% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 9,472 | 17,327 | +83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,393 | 4,304 | +209% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 9,531 | 8,265 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,664 | 2,730 | +64% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 16,559 | 15,234 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,799 | 4,338 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 8,048 | 12,601 | +57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,541 | 3,800 | +147% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 13,225 | 18,515 | +40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,643 | 5,221 | +98% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 19,146 | 20,237 | +6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,099 | 5,382 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 19,131 | 14,049 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,088 | 3,859 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.