Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Expert delivery management for release planning, deployment strategy, incident response, change management, SLA/error-budget tracking, and DORA metrics across continuous delivery pipelines.
.claude/skills/borghei-delivery-manager/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 131% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -11% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 159% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 22% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 116% | 0% |
The agent acts as an expert delivery manager coordinating continuous software delivery. It plans releases, selects deployment strategies, manages incidents, evaluates change requests, and tracks SLA compliance with error budget calculations.
Before generating the plan or report, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
bashpython scripts/release_checker.py --version v2.5.0 # release readiness vs exit criteria python scripts/deploy.py --env production --strategy canary # coordinate a deployment python scripts/sla_calculator.py --service portal --period month # SLA + error budget python scripts/incident_report.py --id INC-2024-0125 # incident report from timeline
| Tool | Purpose | Command | |------|---------|---------| | release_checker.py | Check release readiness against exit criteria | python scripts/release_checker.py --version v2.5.0 | | deploy.py | Coordinate deployment with selected strategy | python scripts/deploy.py --env production --strategy canary | | sla_calculator.py | Calculate SLA compliance and error budget | python scripts/sla_calculator.py --service portal --period month | | incident_report.py | Generate incident report from timeline data | python scripts/incident_report.py --id INC-2024-0125 |
references/release_process.md -- Delivery maturity levels, release planning + exit criteria, change-request types, the release-readiness example, DORA metrics, cross-skill integration, troubleshooting, and success criteria. Read when planning a release or improving the pipeline.references/deployment_patterns.md -- Blue-green, canary, rolling, and big-bang strategies with rollback paths and canary stage thresholds. Read when selecting how to ship.references/incident_management.md -- Severity matrix (SEV-1–SEV-4), the 5-step incident workflow, and post-mortem requirements. Read during incident triage and response.references/sla_management.md -- SLA framework, error-budget calculation example, and burn-rate freeze thresholds. Read when tracking reliability budgets.references/red-flags.md -- Bad-vs-good examples of delivery-management output. Read this to review a release/incident plan before committing to it.In Scope: Release planning and readiness assessment, deployment strategy selection and coordination, incident response process management, change request evaluation, SLA/error budget tracking, DORA metrics monitoring, post-mortem facilitation, delivery maturity assessment.
Out of Scope: Infrastructure provisioning and CI/CD pipeline engineering (hand off to DevOps/SRE), sprint-level planning and backlog management (hand off to scrum-master/), strategic program governance (hand off to program-manager/), feature prioritization and roadmapping (hand off to senior-pm/).
Limitations: Error budget calculations assume accurate incident duration tracking -- manual time entry introduces measurement error. Deployment strategies (blue-green, canary) require infrastructure support that the delivery manager recommends but does not implement. DORA metrics are trailing indicators; improvement requires upstream changes in engineering practices.
| Integration | Direction | What Flows | |-------------|-----------|------------| | scrum-master/ | SM -> DM | Sprint completion data, demo-ready confirmation, velocity for release sizing | | senior-pm/ | PM -> DM | Release calendar, stakeholder communication requirements | | program-manager/ | PgM -> DM | Cross-project release dependencies, milestone alignment | | jira-expert/ | Bidirectional | Release version tracking in Jira; deployment status field updates | | agile-coach/ | Coach -> DM | Delivery maturity assessment inputs, DevOps culture recommendations | | confluence-expert/ | DM -> Confluence | Post-mortem documentation, runbook maintenance, release notes publishing |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 14,536 | 23,140 | +59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,326 | 5,382 | +131% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 19,070 | 18,369 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,881 | 3,993 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 16,095 | 5,918 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,519 | 2,245 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 10,727 | 14,138 | +32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,920 | 3,886 | +102% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 6,084 | 6,439 | +6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 901 | 2,332 | +159% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 14,854 | 12,187 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,600 | 3,178 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 17,924 | 20,803 | +16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,993 | 4,280 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 8,707 | 10,185 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,273 | 2,764 | +117% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 6,347 | 9,812 | +55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 934 | 2,762 | +196% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 4,821 | 7,726 | +60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 816 | 2,622 | +221% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 8,947 | 9,266 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,266 | 2,736 | +116% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 10,267 | 14,012 | +36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,772 | 3,484 | +97% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 9,057 | 9,829 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,471 | 2,937 | +100% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 10,191 | 7,668 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,691 | 2,523 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 5,614 | 10,060 | +79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 867 | 2,797 | +223% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 8,196 | 10,749 | +31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,239 | 2,930 | +136% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 11,135 | 8,614 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,845 | 2,874 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 14,718 | 6,061 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,317 | 2,278 | -2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 8,208 | 10,123 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,216 | 2,705 | +122% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 6,005 | 7,598 | +27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 944 | 2,400 | +154% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 9,464 | 10,111 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,397 | 2,769 | +98% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 12,238 | 7,374 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,899 | 2,414 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +36 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.