Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →borghei/reflect
Turn reflection into decisions by scoring predictions against outcomes and tracking whether commitments held.
Passed 18 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 11 of 22 without it.
and 5 more in the full report
7 fixed12 passed either way4 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 7 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
In commitment tracking, after how many cycles of carrying an open item without progress does the explicit decision rule (date/delegate/kill) get triggered?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Specifies 3 carried cycles as the threshold triggering the explicit decision rule. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Structured reflection at daily, weekly, and quarterly cadence that ends in a changed behaviour rather than a paragraph of feelings. The mechanism is testing recorded beliefs against outcomes: written predictions scored for calibration, and commitments tracked for whether they actually held.
Boundary with weekly-review: that skill runs the weekly operating cadence —
what happened, what is next, priorities and blockers. This one is the learning
layer on top: was my judgement any good across weeks and quarters, and what
should change as a result. Run them back to back, operating review first, using
its output as this skill's raw material. Do not duplicate the wins/blockers
synthesis here.
statement, confidence, and outcome once resolvedtext, status (kept/missed/partial/open), optional due and carried_cyclesdomain per prediction, which is where the most actionable signal appearsBefore generating, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
test cases passed, vs 11 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.