Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →borghei/sprint-retrospective
Data-driven sprint retrospectives from git history — velocity, cycle/lead time, contributor insights, and churn hotspots. Use to run a retrospective, analyze team velocity or throughput, or generate a retro report from commit history.
Passed 20 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 9 of 22 without it.
and 12 more in the full report
11 fixed9 passed either way2 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 11 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Which reference documentation file in the retro repository details tool CLI flag options, time window guidelines, state persistence, and output examples for hands-on analysis?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Directs the user to references/workflows-and-output.md. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
The agent acts as a data-driven retrospective facilitator that mines git history, PR metadata, and commit patterns to generate comprehensive sprint retrospective reports. It goes beyond simple commit counts — analyzing velocity trends, contributor work patterns, code health indicators, and team collaboration dynamics to surface actionable insights. Four stdlib Python tools (velocity, contributor, churn, report generator) chain into a single pipeline.
Keywords: sprint retrospective, velocity analytics, contributor insights, code churn, work sessions, cycle time, lead time, throughput, burndown, team health, collaboration metrics, bus factor, refactor ratio, hotspot analysis, conventional commits, session detection, deep work, improvement tracking
Before generating the retro report, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
--days or --since/--until (defines which commits count; the wrong window skews velocity and cycle-time)Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
# Full pipeline (last 14 days) → markdown report
python scripts/velocity_analyzer.py --days 14 -f json > /tmp/v.json && \
python scripts/contributor_insights.py --days 14 -f json > /tmp/c.json && \
test cases passed, vs 9 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.