Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Search and analyze Reddit content using semantic AI search via reddit-insights.com MCP server. Use when you need to: (1) Find user pain points and frustrations for product ideas, (2) Discover niche markets or underserved needs, (3) Research what people really think about products/topics, (4) Find content inspiration from real discussions, (5) Analyze sentiment and trends on Reddit, (6) Validate business ideas with real user feedback. Triggers: reddit search, find pain points, market research, us
.claude/skills/brianrwagner-reddit-insights/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 211% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 164% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 230% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 159% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 80% | 0% |
Semantic search across millions of Reddit posts. Unlike keyword search, this understands intent and meaning.
Detect from context or ask: "Quick pulse, full research, or strategic intelligence report?"
| Mode | What you get | Best for | |------|-------------|----------| | quick | 1 query, top 5 insights, no synthesis | Fast pain point check, content spark | | standard | 3–5 queries, full synthesis with themes and patterns | Product validation, content research | | deep | Multi-angle research + sentiment analysis + content angles + competitive intelligence | Business decisions, campaign strategy |
Default: standard — use quick for a fast read. Use deep if they're validating a product idea or building a content strategy.
Problem with ChatGPT: It has no real-time Reddit access. It can't search current discussions, can't filter by engagement, and can't show you what people are saying RIGHT NOW about your topic.
This skill provides:
You can replicate this by manually browsing Reddit, searching multiple subreddits, reading hundreds of posts, taking notes, and synthesizing patterns. Takes 1-2 hours per research query. This skill does it in 15-20 seconds.
For Claude Desktop - add to claude_desktop_config.json:
json{ "mcpServers": { "reddit-insights": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "reddit-insights-mcp"], "env": { "REDDIT_INSIGHTS_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here" } } } }
For Clawdbot - add to config/mcporter.json:
json{ "mcpServers": { "reddit-insights": { "command": "npx reddit-insights-mcp", "env": { "REDDIT_INSIGHTS_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here" } } } }
Verify installation:
bashmcporter list reddit-insights
| Tool | Purpose | Key Params | |------|---------|------------| | reddit_search | Semantic search across posts | query (natural language), limit (1-100) | | reddit_list_subreddits | Browse available subreddits | page, limit, search | | reddit_get_subreddit | Get subreddit details + recent posts | subreddit (without r/) | | reddit_get_trends | Get trending topics | filter (latest/today/week/month), category |
| Use Case | Effectiveness | Why | |----------|--------------|-----| | Product comparisons (A vs B) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Reddit loves debates | | Tool/app recommendations | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | High-intent discussions | | Side hustle/money topics | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Engaged communities | | Pain point discovery | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Emotional posts rank well | | Health questions | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Active health subreddits | | Technical how-to | ⭐⭐⭐ | Better to search specific subreddits | | Abstract market research | ⭐⭐ | Too vague for semantic search | | Non-English queries | ⭐ | Reddit is English-dominant |
Product Comparisons (best results!):
"Notion vs Obsidian for note taking which one should I use"
→ Relevance: 0.72-0.81 | Found: Detailed comparison discussions, user experiences
"why I switched from Salesforce to HubSpot honest experience"
→ Relevance: 0.70-0.73 | Found: Migration stories, feature comparisonsSide Hustle/Money Topics:
"side hustle ideas that actually make money not scams"
→ Relevance: 0.70-0.77 | Found: Real experiences, specific suggestionsNiche App Research:
"daily horoscope apps which one is accurate and why"
→ Relevance: 0.67-0.72 | Found: App recommendations, feature requestsPain Point Discovery:
"I hate my current CRM it is so frustrating"
→ Relevance: 0.60-0.64 | Found: Specific CRM complaints, feature wishlists
"cant sleep at night tried everything what actually works"
→ Relevance: 0.60-0.63 | Found: Sleep remedies discussions, medical advice seekingTool Evaluation:
"AI tools that actually save time not just hype"
→ Relevance: 0.64-0.65 | Found: Real productivity gains, tool recommendationsToo Abstract:
"business opportunity growth potential"
→ Relevance: 0.52-0.58 | Returns unrelated generic postsNon-English:
"学习编程最好的方法" (Chinese)
→ Relevance: 0.45-0.51 | Reddit is English-dominant, poor cross-lingual results| Goal | Pattern | Relevance | |------|---------|-----------| | Compare products | "Product A] vs Product B] which should I use" | 0.70-0.81 | | Find switchers | "why I switched from A] to B]" | 0.70-0.73 | | Money/hustle topics | "topic] that actually works/makes money] not scam/hype]" | 0.70-0.77 | | App recommendations | "category] apps which one is accurate/best] and why" | 0.67-0.72 | | Pain points | "I hate my current tool] it is so frustrating/slow]" | 0.60-0.64 | | Solutions seeking | "problem] tried everything what actually works" | 0.60-0.63 |
Each result includes:
title, content - Post textsubreddit - Source community upvotes, comments - Engagement metricsrelevance (0-1) - Semantic match score (0.5+ is good, 0.6+ is strong)sentiment - Discussion/Q&A/Story Sharing/Original Content/Newsurl - Direct Reddit linkExample response:
json{ "id": "1oecf5e", "title": "Trying to solve the productivity stack problem", "content": "The perfect productivity app doesn't exist. No single app can do everything well, so we use a stack of apps. But this creates another problem: multi app fragmentation...", "subreddit": "productivityapps", "upvotes": 1, "comments": 0, "relevance": 0.631, "sentiment": "Discussion", "url": "https://reddit.com/r/productivityapps/comments/1oecf5e" }
User: SaaS founder validating a new project management tool idea
Challenge: Needed to understand real frustrations with existing PM tools (Asana, Monday, ClickUp) to find positioning angle.
Research Query:
reddit_search("I hate my project management tool it's so frustrating for remote teams", limit=50)What They Found (in 18 seconds):
Most upvoted insight (+347 upvotes, r/startups): > "We switched from Monday to a Notion template because Monday felt like learning a new language just to assign a task. Sometimes simple beats powerful."
Positioning Decision: Built messaging around: "Project management that feels like a shared doc, not enterprise software."
Product Changes Made:
Results (6 months post-launch):
Find SaaS opportunity:
reddit_search: "frustrated with project management tools for remote teams"Validate idea:
reddit_search: "your product category] recommendations"reddit_get_subreddit for relevant communities to monitorContent research:
reddit_get_subreddit: Get posts from target communityreddit_search: Find specific questions/discussions with high engagementCompetitive intelligence:
reddit_search: "competitor name] experience"reddit_search: "switched from competitor] to other]"For Product Research:
For Content Ideas:
For Market Validation:
A good Reddit Insights search has:
❌ Being too generic - "marketing tips" returns weak results; "B2B cold email that actually works" is better ❌ Ignoring engagement metrics - A post with 2 upvotes is one person's opinion; 200+ upvotes is validated ❌ Taking single posts as truth - Look for patterns across 5-10 posts minimum ❌ Forgetting to check sentiment - A "Discussion" post is different from a "Q&A" (check the field!) ❌ Not visiting actual threads - The semantic summary is great, but top comments often have gold
Built on semantic AI search (not keyword matching). Find what people REALLY think. Not what marketing says they think.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-10 | fail→fail | 4,737 | 2,680 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 707 | 3,635 | +414% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 4,415 | 5,309 | +20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 219 | 3,470 | +1484% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 17,370 | 8,201 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,306 | 3,483 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 7,461 | 4,849 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,242 | 3,865 | +211% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 11,833 | 6,987 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,606 | 4,241 | +164% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 8,360 | 5,990 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,232 | 4,062 | +230% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 12,020 | 6,881 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,739 | 4,345 | +150% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→fail | 14,175 | 4,198 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,029 | 3,921 | +93% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 11,310 | 2,982 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,706 | 3,682 | +116% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 9,057 | 2,215 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,376 | 3,561 | +159% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 14,269 | 5,701 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,269 | 4,080 | +80% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 11,890 | 12,188 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,816 | 4,642 | +156% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 10,650 | 9,382 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,659 | 4,621 | +179% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 18,137 | 17,389 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,657 | 5,779 | +118% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 17,122 | 9,519 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,402 | 4,593 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 11,386 | 7,547 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,680 | 4,339 | +158% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 11,997 | 12,051 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,819 | 4,956 | +172% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | 17,522 | 13,306 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,820 | 5,184 | +84% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 8,848 | 5,746 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,334 | 4,155 | +211% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 18,452 | 15,895 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,398 | 6,230 | +83% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 16,152 | 13,398 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,768 | 5,532 | +100% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 8,328 | 7,681 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,377 | 4,451 | +223% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 20 counted toward the lift figure. The other 2 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 20 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.