Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/advmat-referee-strategy
Use when choosing suggested and opposed referees for an Advanced Materials submission and pre-empting the objections materials reviewers most often raise. Plans referee selection and objection defense; does not write the manuscript or the rebuttal.
Passed 21 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 13 of 22 without it.
and 11 more in the full report
9 fixed12 passed either way0 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 9 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We have finalized our referee list and pre-empted all major manuscript objections for our initial journal submission. What is the immediate next workflow step tag to output?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Specifies advmat-submission as the next workflow step. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Adv. Mater. work sits at the intersection of synthesis/characterization and function/device. A good referee set covers both competences, plus the breadth the gate demands:
Aim for referees who are current in the field, not conflicted, and not exclusively from your own collaboration network. Follow the journal's rules on number and eligibility.
Address these in the manuscript before submitting; each is a common Adv. Mater. rejection lever:
| Likely objection | Pre-empt by |
|---|---|
| "The advance is incremental / optimization only" | Frame the design rule / trade-off broken; contrast with SOTA |
| "The structure/phase is not proven" | Triangulate with complementary techniques (see advmat-methods) |
test cases passed, vs 13 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.