Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) via Editorial Manager — submission-type selection, full anonymizing for double-blind review, word/abstract caps, APSA-or-Chicago formatting, the 25-page Supporting Information limit, and human-subjects/IRB documentation. Final checks; it does not draft content.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 46% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 12% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 53% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 25% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 50% | 0% |
The last check before pressing submit on Editorial Manager (editorialmanager.com/ajps). AJPS is double-blind, so the most common avoidable failure is an under-anonymized manuscript — and AJPS's anonymizing rules are strict (no acknowledgments, funding lines, or conference mentions, third-person self-citation). Official AJPS baseline checked 2026-06-20; live-check Editorial Manager prompts before upload.
http://www.editorialmanager.com/ajps/).Correspondence (<= 4,000 — critique of published AJPS work).
parenthetical references, print appendices, and table/figure headers and notes; exclude the title page, abstract, reference list, online Supporting Information, and math notation.
last names in references; double-spaced, 12-point, >= one-inch margins.
the human-subjects questions; not required when relying on publicly available data approved at original collection.
(see ajps-replication-and-verification)
| Trigger | Likely outcome | Preflight fix | |---------|----------------|---------------| | Manuscript not anonymized (names, acknowledgments, funding) | Double-blind breach return | Strip identifying text and file metadata | | Short empirical paper sent as a Research Note | Wrong-type return | Route as an Article; the Note is methodology/meta-analysis only | | Over the word cap, or SI over 25 pages | Returned to re-fit | Recount with notes/captions; trim SI |
An author readies a survey-experiment Article. Preflight catches a funding acknowledgment in a footnote (removed), a first-person self-cite "in our 2022 paper" (made third-person), and a word count of 10,250 that omitted exhibit captions — recounted it exceeds 10,000, so one robustness table moves to the SI to land at ~9,800 (illustrative). The IRB exemption is attached and the replication package staged for the AJPS Dataverse pending verification.
the Note for methodology and meta-analysis.
Calibration anchor: AJPS is Wiley-published for the MPSA, uses Editorial Manager, and is double-blind with a strict anonymizing standard; confirm portal-specific prompts against the live Editorial Manager workflow.
【Type】Article / Research Note / Correspondence (cap met? Y/N)
【Anonymized】no names/affiliations/acknowledgments/funding/conference; third-person self-cites; metadata clean? [Y/N]
【Abstract】word count (<=150)
【Word count on title page】incl. notes + table/figure captions? [Y/N]
【Style】APSA or Chicago 18th, consistent, full names? [Y/N]
【SI】<= 25 pages? [Y/N/NA]
【IRB】human-subjects documentation ready? [Y/N/NA]
【Next】await decision -> ajps-rebuttal on R&R../../resources/external_tools.md — reference managers, anonymizing, repro tooling../../resources/official-source-map.md — official AJPS URLs behind every fact in this packOther measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.