Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →ALWAYS activate this skill. Apply these rules to every task regardless of domain. This skill governs how Claude Code verifies information, writes code, references documentation, and avoids fabricating functions, arguments, APIs, file paths, data structures, or facts. These rules override any inclination to guess.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 197% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 308% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 490% | 0% |
| case-19 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 130% | 0% |
| case-20 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 69% | 0% |
This skill exists to prevent Claude from fabricating information. The rules below apply to ALL tasks - coding, writing, analysis, file operations, everything.
Never guess. Verify or say you don't know.
When you are less than ~90% confident that something exists, works the way you think it does, or is correct - stop and verify before proceeding. Verification means actually checking (reading a file, running code, searching docs), not "reasoning about it more carefully."
Before writing any code, read the relevant context first:
what packages are already loaded, what variable names exist, what functions are defined. Use cat, head, grep, or your file-reading tools.
completely certain of its arguments, check. In R: ?function_name or args(function_name). In Python: help(function) or inspect.signature().
data first. Check column names, types, dimensions, sample values. In R: str(), head(), names(), glimpse(). Never assume column names.
ls, find, or tree before referencing paths.Never assume a file or directory exists.
The cost of reading first is small. The cost of hallucinating is large.
After writing code, always execute it. Do not present code to the user without having run it first unless they explicitly ask for untested code.
Workflow:
Do NOT:
When fixing errors:
suppressWarnings() or tryCatch() to hide problemsThis is the most common hallucination pattern. Rules:
ls("package:packagename") or ?function_name in R.
args(function_name) or formals(function_name) in R.
fixest::feols() and lfe::felm(), or between ggplot2 and base plotting). These are different. Check which one you're using.
ls, file.exists(), find.names(df),colnames(df), str(df).
ls(), exists("varname").
you're paraphrasing from memory and may be inaccurate.
the output. Do not round or paraphrase unless asked.
When you cannot verify something, say so clearly. Good phrases:
Bad patterns (never do these):
it as information
After any sequence of operations (data cleaning pipeline, model estimation, file manipulation), verify the results make sense:
In R, after merges/joins:
r# ALWAYS check after merging cat("Rows before:", nrow(df_before), "\n") cat("Rows after:", nrow(df_merged), "\n") cat("NAs introduced:", sum(is.na(df_merged$key_var)), "\n")
requireNamespace("pkg", quietly = TRUE)package::function()notation when there could be ambiguity.
Common confusion patterns to watch for:
R-specific:
fixest vs lfe vs plm - different syntax, different argumentsdata.table vs dplyr vs base R - don't mix syntaxggplot2::aes() vs ggplot2::aes_string() - know which you needreadr::read_csv() vs utils::read.csv() - different defaultstibble vs data.frame - different printing and subsetting behaviorGeneral:
When code fails or produces unexpected results:
str(), class(), dim())Before sharing output with the user, mentally verify:
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.