Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/arpsych-tables-figures
Use when designing the summary tables and conceptual figures for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review — the who-found-what tables and the one framework diagram that carries the spine. Designs exhibits; it does not design the spine itself (arpsych-organizing-framework) or run a meta-analysis (arpsych-transparency-and-reproducibility).
Passed 22 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 13 of 22 without it.
and 8 more in the full report
9 fixed13 passed either way0 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 9 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We have completed auditing our framework diagram, synthesis table, and meta-analytic figures for our ARPsych submission. What is the standard next step in the review writing workflow according to standard exhibit guidelines?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Directs the user to arpsych-writing-style to write the prose surrounding the exhibits | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
A primary paper's figures report results; a review's exhibits organize a literature. ARPsych readers and teachers reproduce the good ones in slides for years. Two exhibit types carry most of the load:
One diagram that makes the spine visible — the taxonomy, the process model, the levels-of-analysis stack, the theory contest. It is the review's logo. Tests:
A structured table that compresses the evidence matrix into reader-facing form — typically rows = studies/constructs, columns = population, design, key finding, replication status. This is how a review honors comprehensiveness without narrating every study: the table holds the coverage, the prose discusses the cell-defining work.
| Exhibit | Carries | Failure mode |
|---|---|---|
| Framework figure | the organizing idea | a pretty diagram that doesn't match the sections |
| Synthesis table | coverage + comparability | a wall of cells with no column that adjudicates |
| Forest / effect plot | a quantitative synthesis | shown without search protocol or heterogeneity |
| Timeline / paradigm map | the evolution of ideas | decorative chronology with no argument |
Annual Reviews copyedits to house format at production and re-renders figures; deliver editable source and high-resolution files, and secure permission for any reproduced/adapted exhibit (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). Color is used in the online/OA version; ensure figures remain legible if printed grayscale. Confirm exact figure specs on the author pages.
test cases passed, vs 13 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.