Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/autonomous-agents-papers-guide
Daily-updated collection of autonomous AI agent papers
Passed 18 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 11 of 22 without it.
and 7 more in the full report
8 fixed10 passed either way3 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
For evaluating general AI assistants across varying task difficulties, generic benchmark tables often give a single accuracy number. What benchmark measures performance on general assistant tasks across explicit levels, and what are the specific SOTA scores for Level 1 versus Level 3?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Identifies GAIA as the multi-level AI assistant benchmark. | Passed | Passed |
| Reports Level 1 score as 75% and Level 3 score as 30%. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
A daily-updated collection of research papers on autonomous AI agents — systems that use LLMs for planning, reasoning, tool use, and multi-step task execution. Covers the full agent stack from foundational prompting techniques (ReAct, Chain-of-Thought) to multi-agent systems, memory architectures, and real-world deployments. Organized chronologically with category tags for easy navigation.
Autonomous Agents
├── Planning & Reasoning
│ ├── Chain-of-Thought (CoT, ToT, GoT)
│ ├── ReAct (Reasoning + Acting)
│ ├── Reflexion (Self-reflection)
│ └── LATS (Language Agent Tree Search)
├── Tool Use & Actions
│ ├── Function calling
│ ├── Code execution
│ ├── Web browsing
│ └── API interaction
├── Memory Systems
│ ├── Short-term (context window)
│ ├── Long-term (vector stores)
│ ├── Episodic (experience replay)
│ └── Procedural (learned strategies)
├── Multi-Agent Systems
│ ├── Debate/discussion (ChatDev, MetaGPT)
│ ├── Hierarchical (manager/worker)
│ ├── Collaborative (shared goals)
│ └── Competitive (adversarial)
└── Applications
├── Software engineering (SWE-agent, Devin)
├── Scientific research (AI Scientist)
├── Web automation (WebArena)
└── Game playing (Voyager)
| Paper | Year | Key Contribution |
test cases passed, vs 11 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.