Use when targeting Brain or deciding whether a clinical-neurology or translational-neuroscience study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the mechanistic-depth-with-clinical-relevance evidence bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, Guarantors of Brain/OUP house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.
SkillScore91Maintained
Automatic
◆Writing & Editing pack
Last verified 9/1/2026
What it changes
Passed 20 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 11 of 22 without it.
Without skill50%
With skill91%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
Rates fit as High
Recommends STROBE reporting guideline
Recommends ARRIVE reporting guidelines
and 9 more in the full report
10 fixed10 passed either way1 still failing1 broke
Pass-rate lift
+41 pp
Tokens
+24%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-40%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 9/1/2026v120 of 22 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 10 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 10
Prompt
We tested a novel small molecule inhibitor in a rat middle cerebral artery occlusion model, showing reduced infarct volume at 24 hours. We have no human tissue, no biomarker data, no longitudinal functional recovery beyond 24 hours, and no clinical cohort. Evaluate fit for Brain.
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
Identifies reliance on a single animal model without human validation as a rejection risk
Passed
Passed
Recommends ARRIVE reporting guidelines
Missed
Passed
case-17 · gemini-3.6-flash · 9/1/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md85 linessingle file
Brain (brain)
Journal positioning
Brain is published by the Guarantors of Brain (Oxford University Press) and is a leading journal of clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, distinguished by its demand for both mechanistic depth and clinical relevance to human nervous-system disease — neurodegeneration, epilepsy, movement disorders, neuroimmunology and neuro-inflammation, neuromuscular disease, neuro-oncology, and the genetics, imaging, and pathology that illuminate disease mechanisms. It serves academic neurologists and neuroscientists and expects work that advances understanding of how a neurological disease arises or progresses, grounded in human data or strongly disease-relevant models; routine clinical-trial reporting without mechanistic insight, and bench neuroscience with no clear disease anchor, are a weak fit. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing aid; it is not clinical or regulatory advice and does not replace the journal's current instructions for authors. Before submitting, re-check the live Brain author instructions.
When to trigger
The author names Brain for a mechanistic clinical-neurology or translational-neuroscience study and wants a fit/framing check.
A neurology study must be re-framed around a disease mechanism with clinical relevance rather than a descriptive cohort or routine trial report.
The author is choosing between Brain, a clinical-trials neurology journal, and a cerebrovascular-specific or basic-neuroscience venue.
The author needs the journal's mechanistic-evidence, reporting-guideline, and desk-reject expectations.
Epilepsy: mechanisms of epileptogenesis, networks, genetics, and surgically/electrophysiologically anchored human studies.
Movement disorders and neuromuscular disease with mechanistic, genetic, or neuropathological depth.
Neuroimmunology and neuro-inflammation (MS, autoimmune encephalitis, antibody-mediated disease) with mechanistic insight.
Disease-relevant neurogenetics, advanced neuroimaging tied to mechanism, and human neuropathology/biomarker studies.
Translational neuroscience in disease-relevant models that directly informs human neurological disease.
Method & evidence bar
Studies are expected to combine rigorous methodology with a clear mechanistic advance grounded in human data or strongly disease-relevant models; correlation-only descriptive cohorts are insufficient.
The applicable reporting guideline must be followed and its checklist supplied: STROBE for observational studies, CONSORT for trials, PRISMA for systematic reviews, STARD for diagnostic/biomarker accuracy; ARRIVE-aligned reporting for animal work.
Interventional trials require prospective registration with the registration number and protocol/statistical-analysis plan.
Mechanistic claims must rest on direct, manipulative or convergent evidence (genetics, pathology, functional readouts), with adequate controls, replication, and human validation where feasible.
Biomarker and imaging claims require an independent validation cohort and comparison against an accepted reference standard.
Genetic and neuropathological studies need adequate sample size/segregation evidence and appropriate statistical handling of multiple comparisons.
Structure & house style
Guarantors of Brain/OUP format with a structured abstract; re-check current article types (Original Article, etc.), graphical-abstract requirements, and limits on the live guide.
The introduction frames a focused disease-mechanism question and its clinical relevance; the discussion integrates mechanism with implications for understanding or managing the neurological disease.
Figures must show controls, replication, and quantification supporting each mechanistic claim; STROBE/CONSORT/PRISMA flow diagrams are expected where applicable.
Supplements carry full methods, genetic/pathological and reagent details, the protocol, and extended cohorts/analyses.