Use when preparing an accepted ACM CCS paper for the ACM Digital Library proceedings, covering de-anonymization, the ACM sigconf final format, ACM rights and eRights forms, badge placement from artifact evaluation, incorporation of shepherd and minor-revision requirements, disclosure-timing coordination, registration, and in-person presentation.
SkillScore86Maintained
Automatic
◆Writing & Editing pack
Last verified 8/15/2026
What it changes
Passed 19 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 10 of 22 without it.
Without skill45%
With skill86%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
Sets [Camera-ready status] to Ready.
Sets [Camera-ready status] to Blocked or Needs fixes.
The readiness indicator uses the value Ready, Needs fixes, or Blocked.
and 14 more in the full report
11 fixed8 passed either way1 still failing2 broke
Pass-rate lift
+41 pp
Tokens
+12%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-33%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/15/2026v119 of 22 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 11 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 11
Prompt
We earned 'Artifacts Available' and 'Artifacts Evaluated - Functional' badges for our accepted security paper. A student suggested placing these badges in an appendix section next to the reproduction instructions. Where should these earned artifact badges be located in the final PDF, and what requirement must be verified for the repository link?
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
States that artifact evaluation badges must be placed on the first page.
Passed
Passed
Requires confirming that the repository archive is public and permanent prior to camera-ready submission.
Missed
Passed
case-04 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/15/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md70 linessingle file
CCS Camera Ready
Use this after acceptance or after clearing a minor revision. Reopen the current CCS
camera-ready instructions, the ACM rights form, the registration page, and the notification
or shepherd email before advising authors.
Camera-ready audit
Convert the anonymous submission to the public proceedings version: author names,
affiliations, acknowledgements, funding, and artifact links restored.
Apply the ACM sigconf final template and the ACM rights-management block; the DOI, the
conference reference string, and the copyright notice come from the ACM eRights system.
Incorporate exactly what the shepherd or the minor-revision decision required, without
expanding the contribution beyond what was reviewed.
Place any artifact-evaluation badges earned (Available, Functional, Reusable, Results
Reproduced) as instructed; badge placement is part of the ACM camera-ready workflow.
Confirm the final title and abstract match the HotCRP-registered title and abstract if the
cycle froze them at registration.
Coordinate disclosure timing: the public proceedings version and any released exploit or
advisory should not appear before the agreed vendor-disclosure date.
Badge placement map
Badge earned in artifact evaluation
Where it goes
What to confirm
Artifacts Available
First page, with the archival DOI/URL
The archive is public and permanent before camera-ready
Artifacts Evaluated - Functional
First page
The committee's functional result is final
Artifacts Evaluated - Reusable
First page
Documentation matches the reusable claim
Results Reproduced
First page
The reproduced results match the camera-ready numbers
De-anonymization sweep
Restore the author block, acknowledgements, grants, and contribution statements the
anonymous version stripped.
Rewrite third-person self-citations into natural first person where it improves clarity.
Replace anonymized repository placeholders with the public, licensed, archived artifact and
test every link from a logged-out browser.
Re-check that de-anonymizing did not silently reveal an embargoed vendor before its patch.
Use when converting an ASPLOS acceptance or Major Revision decision into a publishable ACM paper within the six-week window — de-anonymization, ACM rights and template obligations, the revision change note, artifact-appendix integration and badge placement, and Digital Library metadata checks.