Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/compiledeck
Create and compile beautiful Beamer presentations following the Rhetoric of Decks philosophy.
Passed 17 of 20 test cases with the skill, and 11 of 20 without it.
and 5 more in the full report
6 fixed13 passed either way4 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 5 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I am titling three slides in my empirical economics slide deck: Slide 1 showing descriptive statistics, Slide 2 showing main regression results, and Slide 3 showing robustness checks. What frame titles should I use?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Frame titles state assertion claims summarizing substantive findings rather than topic names like Results or Descriptive Statistics. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Create beautiful Beamer presentations. This skill enforces the Rhetoric of Decks philosophy through concrete, measurable rules — not aspirational guidance.
Before touching anything, answer three questions:
Q1: New deck or editing existing?
.tex file first. Understand its palette, structure, and style before changing anything.Q2: Who is the audience?
See domain_patterns.md in this skill directory for detailed guidance per audience type.
Q3: What's the tone?
palette_reference.md for inspiration.These are not guidelines. They are constraints.
If a slide has two ideas, split it. No exceptions.
If someone reads only the slide titles in sequence, they should understand the entire argument.
test cases passed, vs 11 / 20 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.